[Ambassadors] Re: Co-branding?

[Paul W. Frields]

On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 11:55 +0100, JoergSimon wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 26. März 2008 11:18:33 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> > Branding is more concerned with marketing. Besides if ambassadors are
> > not subscribed to the marketing list, they are not following the
> > recommend procedure at
> >
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/Join
> 
> yes
> 
> > We don't
> > want to cross post either. Refer
> > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2007-March/msg00007.ht
> >ml
> 
> I know the guidelines very well! It was only to shift it to the people who 
> must deal with the consequences of this issue. 
> And if you want play this odd guideline game, then you must admit, we don´t 
> want discuss the same topics again and again! (There are a lot more ... )
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2007-July/msg00086.html
> 
> I want to stop this, because there was enough confusion in the past. And there 
> are clear guidelines that we are not RedHat - and we don´t want.
> 
> i will quote GregdeKoenigsberg:
> 
> "The Fedora brand must evolve separately from Red Hat's brand. Fedora is very 
> important to Red Hat, but Fedora is not Red Hat. It's really crucial to 
> understand that distinction."
> 
> so -1 again.

+1 to Joerg, and -1 to co-branding.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-ambassadors-list/attachments/20080326/84667855/attachment.sig>