[Ambassadors] What to Do?

[Frank Murphy (Frankly3D)]

On 09/08/09 00:02, Joerg Simon wrote:
> On Saturday 08 August 2009 23:38:30 Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote:
>> Stop being so melodramatic
> 
> Oh that is personal ;)

On that I apologise, I got angry.

> 
>> It is not about denouncing,
>> it is about transparency and accountability.
> 
> on what?
> We have transparency and accountability troughout the mentoring and the 
> membership process and have guideline for Eventreports and material requests, 
> reimbursement guidelines ... 
> Everything else what is not in a workflow or report is stated in our Code of 
> Conduct:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/Conduct ...


Fedora Ambassador Conduct
Read our guidelines at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CommunityConduct

Where is the bit not to ignore the public

--snip--

> A example how this is done as a peer can be seen here:
> http://tinyurl.com/mc2cmn
> and at this time i was the one who was angry, got personal and i was far away 
> from being a FAmSCo Member - but FAmSCo was not needed to solve the "problem"

Where is the link to this on the Ambassador page?

> 
>> I hope treating the end-user\potential contributor as nothing.
>> Is not part of this. Customer Service 101.
>> Please do not play Ostrich, and bury your Head of this.
> 
> sorry i do not understand that

The problem still exists,
public being ignored,
we carry on.

> 
>>>  FAmSCo is just an enabler not the inquisition.
>> FamSco is there to steer and give advice, not live in Mount Olympus.
> 

If you cannot engage in dialogue, what then?
as in my reply to David

--snip--
> 
> i am sorry if you see our work in this light - but just to be clear 
> with me in famsco there will be no "platform for reporting 
> bad behavior"
> 

In that you are sincere.