[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Ambassadors] During some of my review of the Fedora 12 "Constantine, " Fedora 12 Talking Points. :)



On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 1:50 AM, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram redhat com> wrote:
> Not really. I don't think talking points are the place for either. If it
> was a entirely new spin that hasn't been there before, it would be
> useful to consider.  For existing spins like FEL, use the dedicated
> pages like http://spins.fedoraproject.org/fel.

The url of the talking point wiki page currently being discussed is :
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Talking_Points

That is: F-12 related. Please tell me how isn't it a place for either
? If it isn't as you said, I wonder what is the use of this wiki page
then if it's not talking about anything ?

> I would like talking points to cover more of the generic content that is
> appealing to a broader audience.
>

So you are assuming that if there are less users interested, why not
drop marketing support for an active team which is doing its one
marketing and trying to get maximum exposure for building a community
around it?

Chitlesh


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]