[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Ambassadors] During some of my review of the Fedora 12"Constantine, " Fedora 12 Talking Points. :)

On Tuesday 15 December 2009 17:04:10 Mel Chua wrote:
> On 12/15/2009 08:49 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:

> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:31:23AM -0500, David Ramsey wrote:
> >> There is some entry for Fedora Electronic Lab, eh?  I do not
> >> understand this for my presentation.

> > I'll revert that edit.

i think the better way would be to explain what relevance FEL has, to David.

> Thanks for the catch, David - and for the edit, Paul. Copying the
> Marketing list on this.
> The Talking Points that the Marketing team produces for our release
> deliverables are talking points for the Desktop (GNOME) Spin.

while some the arguments for spins maybe are valid and the work on the spins 
pages is absolut great, i do not think that marketing has understand the 
relevance of fel  - this is not just a spin, it is something really unique in 
Fedora - no other Distribution has something mature like this related to 
electronics. Chitlesh and the fel gang could go the easy way by just making a 
remix with strange licences - but they work hard with the electronics 
industrie to convince them to change licences to have it in fel or even become 
contributors. It has also Ambassador Relevance - i could hire some of the most 
brilliant contributors through fel, they came as normal software-, computer 
enthusiasts and were more than happy i introduced fel to them - so i suggest 
put it back - this has general relevance in some parts of the world! 

cu Joerg

Joerg (kital) Simon
jsimon fedoraproject org
Key Fingerprint:
3691 0989 2DCA 58A2 8D1F 2CAC C823 558E 5B5B 5688

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]