[Ambassadors] Active or Inactive

[S.K.]

+1
2009/2/26 Digvijay Patankar <dbpatankar at gmail.com>

> Yes, I too am support Li, Songlin. Why we need to discuss this and waste
> our time?
> Better talk on something else.
> There is no point on talking on "active" or "inactive".
>
> Li, Songlin wrote:
> > It's boring arguing about "active" and "inactive".
> > I am wondering why we want to talk about this.
> >
> > 2009/2/26 Hernan Pachas <hernan.pachas at gmail.com>
> >
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>> In my opinion, anyone who cares to read, think about, or respond to
> >>>> this ongoing thread is considered active :)
> >>>>
> >>> OK, I was holding back so as not to add to the noise, but if I'm
> >>> required to do so.. ;-)
> >>> --
> >>> Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
> >>> Departamento de Informatica                    Fono: +56 32 2654431
> >>> Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria             +56 32 2654239
> >>> Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000       Fax:  +56 32 2797513
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
> >>> Fedora-ambassadors-list at redhat.com
> >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list
> >>>
> >>>
> >> --
> >> Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
> >> Fedora-ambassadors-list at redhat.com
> >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > --
> > Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
> > Fedora-ambassadors-list at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list
> >
>
> --
> Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
> Fedora-ambassadors-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list
>



-- 
S.K.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-ambassadors-list/attachments/20090226/416c54c3/attachment.htm>