[Ambassadors] [Discussion] Reporting template for ambassadors.

Roy Ong me at royong.com
Thu Feb 19 05:59:50 UTC 2009

On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 23:43 -0600, inode0 wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Roy Ong <me at royong.com> wrote:
> > + +
> > i think there is a need to agree on a proper definition of "dead
> > ambassadors" ...
> I haven't referred to them as "dead" ambassadors but the ambassadors
> we are talking about are ambassadors who don't respond to email when
> they are contacted via their ambassador wiki links. All I am in favor
> of is removing the wiki links to them, not removing them as
> ambassadors as they may well be doing other ambassador activities.
> We simply don't want to frustrate people who are trying to contact us
> via wiki links, which is one common way for people both inside the
> Fedora community and outside to try to contact us. We also don't want
> to miss important opportunities for Fedora which now happens when
> those contacted don't respond to inquiries.
> John

i'll agree on that. responding to an email and keeping the wiki updated
with a valid email address is the least that one should do.

More information about the Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list