[Ambassadors] inactive ambassadors, a proposed solution
wcervini at fedoraproject.org
Thu Feb 19 16:20:03 UTC 2009
2009/2/20 María Leandro <tatica at fedoraproject.org>
> 2009/2/20 Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay <foss.mailinglists at gmail.com>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Max Spevack <mspevack at redhat.com> wrote:
>> > WHAT DO WE DO WITH INACTIVE AMBASSADORS?
>> > If someone is inactive, we *DO NOT* kick them out of the ambassadors
>> > in FAS, and we *DO NOT* remove them from fedora-ambassadors list.
>> > But we should remove them from the "directory of Ambassadors sorted by
>> > country", which I argue again needs to be much more visible and useful,
>> > that those inactive Ambassadors aren't being asked to do public-facing
>> > things.
>> > When someone re-surfaces or has more time for Ambassadors, we put them
>> > on the directory.
>> +1 to this and, thanks for writing this up.
>> http://www.gutenberg.net - Fine literature digitally re-published
>> http://www.plos.org - Public Library of Science
>> http://www.creativecommons.org - Flexible copyright for creative work
>> Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
>> Fedora-ambassadors-list at redhat.com
> Maria Gracia Leandro
> LinuxUser= 440285
> GPG Public Key: E1CDCC56
> "Be yourself... Don't be anyone else"
> Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
> Fedora-ambassadors-list at redhat.com
W at lt3r C3rv1n|
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Fedora-ambassadors-list