[Ambassadors] famsco nomination time is over in 24 h !!!

[Francesco Ugolini]

2009/11/16 inode0 <inode0 at gmail.com>:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Neville A. Cross <nacross at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:34 AM, inode0 <inode0 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> <snip>
>>>
>>>> Just wondering, hope other people consider the process and not only
>>>> the final state of the nomination page.
>>>
>>> I think you should suggest everything that you feel would make the
>>> process better so we can learn and improve in the future.
>>>
>> I will look for the proper channel to submit my suggestion, you are right.
>
> I think you in the proper channel now since FAmSCo sets the rules and
> they should read what shows  up here. Perhaps it will encourage others
> to make suggestions too.
>
> John
>

Thank you for all these feedbacks.

First of all, we used to write candidate statment/future plans (and so
on) since the first election hold in 2006. As I said writing a
statment don't require 1000 words: even a word can clearly show the
vision of the candidate. This is important because it helps figuring
our the vision. We are Ambassadors, and an Ambassadors skill is to be
able to  communicate.

You'll be able to see the list of names during the election, but sure,
having the statments write in the nomination page doesn't create any
problem.

Second, we never had the problem to consider the alphabetical order,
since we haven't noticed any problem with this system.

If people prefer to have names alphabetically sorted, it's not a
problem, just 2 minutes of wiki editing and everything will work.

Tell us (from candidates too) if you need this to be done.

Regards

Francesco