[Ambassadors] famsco nomination time is over in 24 h !!!

[inode0]

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Francesco Ugolini
<fugolini at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Thank you for all these feedbacks.
>
> First of all, we used to write candidate statment/future plans (and so
> on) since the first election hold in 2006. As I said writing a
> statment don't require 1000 words: even a word can clearly show the
> vision of the candidate. This is important because it helps figuring
> our the vision. We are Ambassadors, and an Ambassadors skill is to be
> able to  communicate.

I agree having a short statement is useful. Is it required? Do we
accept nominations that don't include them?

> You'll be able to see the list of names during the election, but sure,
> having the statments write in the nomination page doesn't create any
> problem.
>
> Second, we never had the problem to consider the alphabetical order,
> since we haven't noticed any problem with this system.

Just to be clear I wasn't suggesting we put the names in alphabetical
order. I just used that as an example of one rule that exists
elsewhere for ordering the names on the nomination page. Having them
appear in the order the nominations were made seems good to me too,
maybe even better since it carries some information along with it.

I don't think we need to do anything this time around, but if people
would like a more specific rule for next time they can suggest one. :)

John