Let's use double-layer DVD - they are more easy-to-use that double-sided DVDs. And idea of distributing source codes with binaries is nice. Regards, REDbyte <div>2006/3/17, Behdad Esfahbod <<a href="mailto:behdad@cs.toronto.edu">behdad@cs.toronto.edu</a>>:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Tejas Dinkar wrote: > On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 09:07 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > > I think the important question is, do all DVD drives support > > double-layered? I'm afraid not. How much do we lose that way? > > All of them, in theory... I was talking about in practice. But guess yeah, as many video DVDs are double-layered. Then I really don't see why we may do double-sided. > It is in the DVD standards So are DVD-R, DVD+R, DVD-RAM, and bazillion others. Not all early drives handled them all. > > And are we going to have PPC DVDs too? > > Of course Neat. --behdad <a href="http://behdad.org/"> http://behdad.org/</a> "Commandment Three says Do Not Kill, Amendment Two says Blood Will Spill" -- Dan Bern, "New American Language" -- Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list <a href="mailto:Fedora-ambassadors-list@redhat.com">Fedora-ambassadors-list@redhat.com</a> <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list </a> </blockquote></div>