Hi all, <div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">OTOH: I'm going to question the fact if we need a steering committee anyway. Basically I was stunned when I read that famsco has a meeting twice a year. I don't get the point of it then anymore.</blockquote><div> absolutely agree about it . What is the main actions of FAMSCO today globally. I can see the effort of Rodrigo reggionally who is making a lot of things. But what if we can "revisoring" the famsco role and recreate just like a more active equipment. Options can be - 2 persons per region as couf said. Representing Fedora worldwide. - Proposals directly focused on spreading Fedora per Region - 1 Cancellour Wordlwide. In LA we feel some outside some times. Yesterday a newcomer ambassador wants to join and the the form didnt work. The way to become an ambassador are so complex that nobody wants to join sometimes. What about "non technical" ambassadors, needs an skils levels to become ambassador. Supose that some goberment executive wants to become fedora ambassador and the only thing he knows is GNOME, nothing about PGP but has the skills to promote Fedora. Leaving out this guy?.... </div></div>I think that we must vote at first if we want this system going on in this way or make a refresh. The real problem is that, when u fly "a bit under the radar" as max in his blog, whe opinions comes more weak. Its more than FAMSCO, its about how to become more activa and inclusive... My Dollar (my two cents are less that i propose) ;) Best regards -- -- Pablo Barrera <a href="http://www.proyectofedora.org"> http://www.proyectofedora.org</a> <a href="http://www.pablobarrera.com.ar">http://www.pablobarrera.com.ar</a>