Fedora Weekly News Issue 118
Thomas Chung
tchung at fedoraproject.org
Mon Feb 4 10:51:23 UTC 2008
= Fedora Weekly News Issue 118 =
Welcome to Fedora Weekly News Issue 118 for the week of January 28th,
2008. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue118
In Planet Fedora, we have "Updates to anaconda", "linux.conf.au day 1,
"Fedora win32 livecd-iso-to-usb tool" and "Video: Simple layer
blending in Gimp"
In Fedora Marketing, we have "Tasks set by Marketing Meeting on IRC",
"RPM Fusion interview", "2008 Readers' Choice Survey" and "FUDCon
Video Torrent"
To join or give us your feedback, please visit
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/NewsProject/Join.
[[TableOfContents]]
1. Planet Fedora
1. Updates to anaconda
2. linux.conf.au day 1
3. Fedora win32 livecd-iso-to-usb tool
4. Video: Simple layer blending in Gimp
2. Marketing
1. Tasks set by Marketing Meeting on IRC
2. RPM Fusion interview
3. 2008 Readers' Choice Survey
4. FUDCon Video Torrent
3. Ambassadors
1. Manipal's First Fedora 8 Install Fest
4. Developments
1. Net-install ISO Already Exists As ''rescuecd.iso''
2. Firefox 3 Liberation Fonts
3. Firefox And Epiphany Crashes
4. Cannot Access Hardware Clock Via Any Known Method
5. Devilspie And Angelcake: Asus Eee PC Continued
6. PulseAudio Crashing Applications?
5. Infrastructure
1. Koji vacuuming
2. Collabaration Servers
3. fedora.org domain
6. Artwork
1. The quest for T-Shirts
2. Countdown to Round 2
7. Security Advisories
1. Fedora 8 Security Advisories
2. Fedora 7 Security Advisories
8. Events and Meetings
1. Fedora Board Meeting Minutes 2008-01-29
2. Fedora Community Architecture Meeting 2008-01-28
3. Fedora Ambassadors Steering Committee Meeting 2008-MM-DD
4. Fedora Marketing Meeting 2008-01-30
5. Fedora Documentation Steering Committee (Log) 2008-01-29
6. Fedora Engineering Steering Committee Meeting 2008-01-31
7. Fedora Infrastructure Meeting (Log) 2008-01-31
8. Fedora Release Engineering Meeting 2008-01-29
9. Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting 2008-01-30
10. Fedora Bug Zappers Meeting 2008-01-30
11. Fedora SIG EPEL Report Week 05/2008
12. Fedora SIG KDE Report Week NN/2008
13. Fedora SIG Astronomy Meeting (Log) 2008-02-02
[[Anchor(PlanetFedora)]]
== Planet Fedora ==
In this section, we cover a highlight of Planet Fedora - an
aggregation of blogs from world wide Fedora contributors.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Planet
Contributing Writers: ThomasChung
=== Updates to anaconda ===
JeroenVanMeeuwen points out in his blog[1],
"This morning I tried to provision a Fedora 7 Xen guest using a nice
kickstart configuration file. However anaconda showed a traceback.
Updates to anaconda are such a great deal, re-spinning (for Fedora
Unity) or re-composing (business and pleasure, yes sir!) media will
get you to appreciate that. So, here it is, repositories with packages
for anaconda."
[1] http://blogs.fedoraunity.org/kanarip/2008/02/03/updates-to-anaconda
=== linux.conf.au day 1 ===
EugeneTeo points out in his blog[1],
"Fedora mini-conf went very well today. There were no technical
hiccups, and everything went smoothly according to plan. We had an
awesome crowd of 30 to 40 delegates which totally exceeded my
expectations. David blogged, and summarized all the talks at the
mini-conf in his wiki. Alex wrote a nice summary of Dave's Fedora
kernel talk on his blog."
[1] http://www.kernel.sg/blog/2008/01/28/linuxconfau-day-1-fedora-mini-conf-and-lguest/
=== Fedora win32 livecd-iso-to-usb tool ===
MohdIzharFirdaus points out in his blog[1],
"I just noticed LukeMacken's post[2] at fedora-devel-list...Cool!"
[1] http://blog.kagesenshi.org/2008/02/fedora-will-be-having-win32-livecd-iso.html
[2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-February/msg00087.html
=== Video: Simple layer blending in Gimp ===
KonstantinRyabitsev points out in his blog[1]
"This little trick is known to pretty much every non-beginner user of
photoshop or gimp. In this screencast I show how to quickly and
effectively enhance your photos with Gimp using layer blending."
[1] http://blog.mricon.com/2008/02/simple-layer-blending-in-gimp.html
[[Anchor(Marketing)]]
== Marketing ==
In this section, we cover Fedora Marketing Project.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing
Contributing Writer: ThomasChung
=== Tasks set by Marketing Meeting on IRC ===
ColbyHoke reports[1],
"Just updated this[2] - feel free to add anything I may have missed.
We'll announce the next meeting soon - for those that could not join
us, I hope to have a meeting late at night (for me) where we can
discuss any ideas you folks around the world have."
[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2008-January/msg00293.html
[2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing/Tasks
=== RPM Fusion interview ===
JonathanRoberts reports[1],
"This interview[2] is up now. Hope everyone is happy with it, and if
you enjoy it be sure to digg[3] it."
[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2008-January/msg00288.html
[2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Interviews/RPMFusion
[3] http://digg.com/linux_unix/RPM_Fusion_One_Repository_to_Rule_Them_All
=== 2008 Readers' Choice Survey ===
RahulSundaram reports[1],
"Leave your footprints:[2]"
[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2008-January/msg00272.html
[2] http://www.linuxjournal.com/node/1006101
=== FUDCon Video Torrent ===
MaxSpevack reports[1],
"The first of the FUDCon videos[2] are up."
[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2008-January/msg00273.html
[2] http://spevack.livejournal.com/44085.html
'''Editor's Note''' We're in the process of making the video available
in flash version.
[[Anchor(Ambassadors)]]
== Ambassadors ==
In this section, we cover Fedora Ambassadors Project.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
Contributing Writer: JeffreyTadlock
=== Manipal's First Fedora 8 Install Fest ===
AnkurShrivastava reported[1] on Manipal's first Fedora 8 Install Fest
in the fedora-ambassadors list. The event was a two day event
organized by Fedora Ambassadors AnkurShrivastava and DhananjaySingh as
part of the Manipal Linux User Group and was held on campus. Day one
explained the advantages and importance of Linux and a preview of the
next day's actual installs. The install day started with installation
steps being shown and explained followed with the actual installs.
Any issues encountered during the installs were solved before the
install fest was finished. Photos[2] of the install fest are also
available.
[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-ambassadors-list/2008-January/msg00217.html
[2] http://flickr.com/photos/ankurkingofnet/sets/72157600264068727/
[[Anchor(Developments)]]
== Developments ==
In this section, we cover the problems/solutions, people/personalities, and
ups/downs of the endless discussions on Fedora Developments.
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Contributing Writer: OisinFeeley
=== Net-install ISO Already Exists As ''rescuecd.iso'' ===
MichaelDeHaan reported[1] on a discussion at FUDCon on the use of
Debian-style net-install ISOs. He posited large bandwidth savings as
one of the attractions. ChrisAdams was less sure[2], commenting that a
DVD download was used multiple times, while each net install would
require duplication. LesMikesell recommended[3] a proxy to cache large
files to those who do much of this type of thing.
[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03014.html
[2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03016.html
[3] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03022.html
JasonTibbitts thought[4] that he had been doing what Michael described
for all his Fedora releases. JeremyKatz added[5] that the ''rescuecd''
image was already capable of this and was going to be renamed to
emphasize its utility. He added that ChrisLumens had been doing some
work to delay repository selection to stage2 in order to allow the
selection of mirrorlists and proxies.
[4] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03015.html
[5] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03018.html
=== Firefox 3 Liberation Fonts ===
A simple request[1] from MarkG85 to make Firefox 3 use the Liberation
fonts as defaults in Fedora 9 prompted and interesting discussion.
MarkG85 posted screenshots of his experience in Rawhide and claimed
that the Liberation fonts were obviously better than the defaults.
NicolasMailhot was highly skeptical[2] and suggested that "looking
better" was a purely subjective judgment mostly influenced by
familiarity. He also commented that encoding coverage and upstream
responsiveness were more appropriate metrics and that DejaVu won on
that basis.
[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg02847.html
[2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg02857.html
FelixMiata argued[3] that if the goal of choosing fonts which matched
Windows' font metrics were accepted then LiberationSans proved the
best substitute for Arial. The advantage of this would be uniformity
of web browsing experience. Nicolas' detailed and interesting response
pointed[4] out that Windows fonts have varied widely across time and
application and that due to the Mozilla Foundation's lack of
stewardship it would be best not to chase fonts. Instead effort might
be better spent on "creat[ing] our own solid font set than continue
chasing the Microsoft tail indefinitely - it has the financial means
to move way faster than us on the font creation front anyway." This
exchange between Felix and Nicolas is worth reading. Nicolas
pointed[5] out that the page-zoom[6] features of Firefox 3 will result
in huge differences between Fedora and Windows systems even if the
very same fonts are installed and that "legal issues" cannot be
ignored.
[3] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg02862.html
[4] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg02870.html
[5] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg02953.html
[6] http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/try-firefox-3-full-page-zoom-with-full-page-zoom/
Several people argued that the premise of the thread was mistaken.
Among them was BehdadEsfahbod who outlined[7] the normal course of
events in which a web-browser picks which fonts to use. MarkG85
restated[8] his objectives to make it clear that he was not interested
in "mimic[ing] a well known other operating system" but rather trying
to recapture the pleasant appearance of Firefox 2.
[7] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg02956.html
[8] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg02871.html
A suggestion was made[9] by NicolasMailhot that the way forward
involved ripping out Firefox's font defaults and making it use desktop
font settings so that users with a preference can implement their
choice across all applications.
[9] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg02887.html
=== Firefox And Epiphany Crashes ===
A report[1] by HorstvonBrand that Firefox and Epiphany were crashing
after the updates of 30 Jan 2008 led to a request from
ChristopherAillon that people testing Firefox 3 would report bugs
upstream instead of at Red Hat's bugzilla. JoachimFrieben had
experienced[2] the same issues as Horst and pinpointed the changes to
a specific ''xulrunner'' build.
[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03118.html
[2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03135.html
Christopher explained[3] that he was pulling from CVS HEAD and in
general not adding patches to the Fedora package and it would thus be
a good idea for Fedora testers to report bugs upstream. JakubRusinek
(livio) preferred[4] to pull the nightly snapshot from Mozilla itself
although Christopher argued that there would be no final
Mozilla-distributed binary so it would be helpful to test the Fedora
binary. Jakub noted that he needed fresh vanilla sources for his
purposes, to which Christopher responded[5] that he was pulling from
CVS, packaging them in RPM format and that the nightly builds at
Mozilla were often older than Christopher's own. Jakub still seemed[6]
to prefer using Mozilla's builds arguing that it was easier to find
changes.
[3] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03155.html
[4] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03168.html
[5] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03187.html
[6] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03189.html
A similar point was made[7] by Horst, who asked how it would be
possible to know what Fedora-specific tweaks had been made, what the
CVS revision was and also pointed out that these would not be
"official" upstream binaries, all of which would make it difficult to
report bugs intelligently. Christopher responded[8] that: 1)no
upstream binaries exist; 2)there is no such thing as a CVS-wide
revision, so snapshot date is acceptable for bug filing;
3)Fedora-specific tweaks are minimal and involve using shared
libraries instead of static libraries in the binaries. Also of
interest is the building of Firefox as a XULrunner application about
which Mozilla is keen to receive feedback. This seemed good enough for
Horst who duly opened a bug report[9].
[7] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03173.html
[8] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03178.html
[9] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03192.html
=== Cannot Access Hardware Clock Via Any Known Method ===
Repeatedly during booting of a rawhide machine SteveGrubb noticed the
message "Cannot access the Hardware Clock via any known method" and
wondered[1] if anyone else running x86_64 rawhide had noticed the
message. RexDieter confirmed[2] that he and TomCallaway had noticed it
and speculated that ''hwclock'' was being fired up before ''/dev/rtc''
had been created by ''udev''.
[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03042.html
[2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03043.html
Further discussion led HansdeGoede to point out[3] that there was a
bugzilla entry which described[4] the problem and possible solutions.
It seemed that the problem is due to there being three possible RTC
drivers and ''mkinitrd'' creating ''/dev/rtc'' with the wrong
major/minor device numbering.
[3] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03084.html
[4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=290731
A detailed explanatory post[5] from Hans explained his view of the
problem, his proposed fix and expressed his desire that some attention
would be drawn to the bug. JoachimFrieben suggested[6] a temporary
means (synchronizing the system clock before startup with NTP) of
mitigating the bug until it is fixed. BillNottingham agreed[7] with
Hans that it might be possible to move the setting of the clock later,
but still make it available as early as possible in order to
co-ordinate log messages and other events. Using the kernel to
automatically set the clock upon ''/dev/rtc'' instantiation was noted
as being limited by the requirement of all users to use UTC.
SimoSorce asked and DanHorák confirmed[8] that this was a problem for
dual-boot systems. Dan provided an interesting link to a plea[9] to
Microsoft to set the RTC to use UTC.
[5] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03047.html
[6] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03052.html
[7] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03072.html
[8] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03080.html
[9] http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/mswish/ut-rtc.html
=== Devilspie And Angelcake: Asus Eee PC Continued ===
The discussion of the Asus EeePC (FWN#117 "Fedora 9 For Asus
EeePC"[1]) continued with some interesting developments. It seemed[2]
that ChrisSnook and JayCliburn, as the main Atheros driver developers,
had received a "huge code dump from Atheros" and were producing a
unified ''atlx'' Atheros driver. Chris requested ''atl2'' testers to
contact him off-list.
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue117#head-751f643f1077b796d203768c770db644c81ea364
[2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg02884.html
ChuckEbbert responded[3] to Orion's earlier question with the
information that ACPI support for the Eeeepc is being worked on by
Debian developers and discussions on upstreaming it into the kernel
are happening.
[3] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03097.html
LamontPeterson took up[4] JohnPalmieri's suggestion that avoiding a
swap partition, while desirable, might lead to more OOM[5] troubles.
Lamont recalled a Linux Journal article on the topic of setting memory
ceilings on embedded systems to prevent the OOM Killer triggering.
[4] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-February/msg00043.html
[5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Out_of_memory
[6] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-February/msg00078.html
A quick note posted[7] by OrionPoplawski about the dearth of
information on the Eeepc (and his own identification of the drive as
"SILICONMOTION SM223AC") stimulated JonNettleton to add[8] that he had
been hacking on ''devilspie''[9] (a utility to detect window creation
and apply placement and sizing rules to them) in order to make it
automatically resize windows in response to window-geometry
thresholds. RahulSundaram shared[10] a current discussion with the
Eeedora developers who seem to be interested in making their distro
work on the 2GB Eee PCs.
[7] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg02928.html
[8] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg02933.html
[9] http://www.burtonini.com/blog/computers/devilspie
[10] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2008-January/msg00277.html
Jon clarified[11] that he was not part of Eeedora[11a], and was
primarily interested in a heavily-changed, non-Fedora-branded
derivative with many changes to upstream Fedora. His central
interests involve dealing with the challenges of the small,
low-resolution screen: hence his hacking on ''devilspie'' and a
possible GUI tool (provisionally named ''angelcake'') to configure it.
Jon also expressed interest in updating ''asus_acpi'' to handle the
keys and improving boot speed. YaakovNemoy suggested using XMonad[12]
instead of ''devilspie'' but Jon was able to point to the ability of
Metacity to do compositing (still in Rawhide) and the simplicity of
''devilspie''. DouglasMcClendon also seemed taken with it and
suggested[13] investigating ''wmctrl''.
[11] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03061.html
[11a] http://wiki.eeeuser.com/howto:eeedora
[12] http://xmonad.org/
[13] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03180.html
After all the interest shown Jon was encouraged by RahulSundaram to
start a wiki-page detailing his progress, which seems[14] very
promising.
[14] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-February/msg00078.html
=== PulseAudio Crashing Applications? ===
A request was made[1] by WarrenTogami for other people's experiences
with ''pidgin'', ''mplayer'', ''xine'' crashing on a regular basis,
especially whether they had backtraces. MatthiasClasen wondered[2] why
Warren assumed that his crashes had anything to do with PulseAudio if
he had not yet seen backtraces.
[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03123.html
[2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03124.html
Some kvetching about PulseAudio in general and why it had been
included in Fedora 8 stimulated ChrisSnook to complain[3] about the
general state of KDE in Fedora. He was clear that he welcomed the
"Gnome developers [...] pushing ahead with all this nest stuff[.]"
When AndrewFarris pushed[4] him on the point, suggesting that the
problems were due to the small number of Fedora KDE developers rather
than Gnome developers breaking KDE Chris produced[5] a splendid rant.
His general point seemed to be that KDE development was too hampered
by interference from "Gnomifiers" and that there was a lack of
responsiveness compared to, for example, SELinux development.
[3] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03138.html
[4] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03140.html
[5] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03142.html
The wind was slightly taken[6] out of the sails of the complaint when
RexDieter explained that the packaging of PulseAudio had been
constructed carefully so that it was easy to remove it in KDE with a
{{{rpm -e kde-settings-pulseaudio alsa-plugins-pulseaudio}}} followed
by restarting the KDE session. LaurentRineau added[7] some suggestions
about how this could be made a per-user choice.
[6] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03148.html
[7] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03162.html
Backtraces were supplied[8] by AndrewFarris of a crash of
''rhythmbox'' and also some possibly related to ''xulrunner''.
[8] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03141.html
[[Anchor(Infrastructure)]]
== Infrastructure ==
In this section, we cover the Fedora Infrastructure Project.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure
Contributing Writer: HuzaifaSidhpurwala
=== Koji vacuuming ===
ToshioKuratomi reports [1]
There has been some vaccuming of the huge rpmfiles tables in koji. The
vaccuming took 14 hours and was successfull at removing dead tuples
that had accumulated in the database. There was also an increase in
the
maintenance_work_mem to 1GB.
[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-January/msg00114.html
=== Collabaration Servers ===
MikeMcGrath reports [2]
There was a discussion about collab1.fedoraproject.org and what
services we would like to have on that. It would nice to have gobby, a
pastebin and mailman on that. Then there was a discussion on which
specific pastebin to use for the server.
[2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-January/msg00132.html
=== fedora.org domain ===
AnandCapur reports [3]
Anand asked about getting the fedora.org domain, but the domain was
never owned by us and it was registered soon as the fedora project
started.
[3] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-January/msg00132.html
[[Anchor(Artwork)]]
== Artwork ==
In this section, we cover Fedora Artwork Project.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork
Contributing Writer: NicuBuculei
=== The quest for T-Shirts ===
MaxSpevack challenge the Art Team with a new quest[1]: create a new
generation of Fedora themed T-Shirts, both for general use, special
events like FUDCons and LinuxTag and crazy stuff based on the Fedora 9
codename. This is preliminary, details about manufacturing are to be
determined, but the team started a page to collect those designs[2].
All contributors are warmly welcomed.
[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/2008-January/msg00350.html
[2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/T-Shirt
=== Countdown to Round 2 ===
NicuBuculei warned on the fedora-art-list[1]: "The current deadline
for Round 2 is less than one week away, February 5th." There is still
time, but not much, for the Fedora 9 theme proposals[2] from Round 1
to be updated, expanded and polished and stay in competition for the
final look of the distro. Members of the team are invited to play with
the current designs, everybody is invited to join the team.
[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/2008-February/msg00000.html
[2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/F9Themes
[[Anchor(SecurityAdvisories)]]
== Security Advisories ==
In this section, we cover Security Advisories from fedora-package-announce.
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-announce
Contributing Writer: ThomasChung
=== Fedora 8 Security Advisories ===
* icu-3.8-5.fc8 -
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-January/msg00896.html
* xine-lib-1.1.10-1.fc8 -
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-January/msg00956.html
* rb_libtorrent-0.12-3.fc8 -
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-February/msg00001.html
* SDL_image-1.2.6-5.fc8 -
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-February/msg00008.html
* kdebase-3.5.8-31.fc8 -
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-February/msg00038.html
* rb_libtorrent-0.12-3.fc8 -
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-February/msg00050.html
* deluge-0.5.8.3-1.fc8 -
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-February/msg00079.html
=== Fedora 7 Security Advisories ===
* icu-3.6-20.fc7 -
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-January/msg00921.html
* kernel-2.6.23.14-64.fc7 -
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-January/msg00968.html
* xine-lib-1.1.10-1.fc7 -
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-January/msg00976.html
* kdebase-3.5.8-31.fc7 -
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-February/msg00031.html
* SDL_image-1.2.5-7.fc7 -
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-February/msg00039.html
* kernel-2.6.23.14-60.fc7 -
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-February/msg00061.html
* deluge-0.5.8.3-1.fc7 -
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-February/msg00069.html
[[Anchor(EventsMeetings)]]
== Events and Meetings ==
In this section, we cover event reports and meeting summaries from
various Projects and SIGs.
Contributing Writer: ThomasChung
=== Fedora Board Meeting Minutes 2008-01-29 ===
* https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2008-February/msg00003.html
=== Fedora Community Architecture Meeting 2008-01-28 ===
* http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CommunityArchitecture/Meetings/2008-01-28
=== Fedora Ambassadors Steering Committee Meeting 2008-MM-DD ===
* No Report
=== Fedora Marketing Meeting 2008-01-30 ===
* https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2008-January/msg00304.html
* http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing/Meetings/Minutes/IRCLog20080130
=== Fedora Documentation Steering Committee (Log) 2008-01-29 ===
* http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/2008-January/msg00255.html
=== Fedora Engineering Steering Committee Meeting 2008-01-31 ===
* https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg03181.html
=== Fedora Infrastructure Meeting (Log) 2008-01-31 ===
* https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-February/msg00000.html
=== Fedora Release Engineering Meeting 2008-01-29 ===
* https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-January/msg02913.html
=== Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting 2008-01-30 ===
* http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20080130
=== Fedora Bug Zappers Meeting 2008-01-30 ===
* http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/Meetings/Agenda-2008-Jan-30
=== Fedora SIG EPEL Report Week 05/2008 ===
* https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2008-February/msg00009.html
=== Fedora SIG KDE Report Week NN/2008 ===
* No Report
=== Fedora SIG Astronomy Meeting (Log) 2008-02-02 ===
* https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-astronomy-list/2008-February/msg00000.html
--
Thomas Chung
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThomasChung
More information about the fedora-announce-list
mailing list