New Icon Set...[echo]...
Nicu Buculei
nicu_fedora at nicubunu.ro
Tue Aug 8 06:17:44 UTC 2006
Diana Fong wrote:
>
> Something I found interesting/useful was the small icon
> discussion...when does the icon start to break down? I had originally
> thought of only the 16x16 as requiring the simplified version and was on
> the fence for 24x24...but from the feedback, it seems that the icons
> need to be simplified even before that size. So, instead of saying that
> it's just horrible and unusable at smaller sizes, if we can figure out
> at what point the icons need to be fixed, then that would be
> constructive. I know in the Leon's package, there included 22 and 24 in
> addition to 48...and the 22 was probably horrendous...but there's also
> 32 and 36 versions that are used as well...how do those look?
I feel the need for a very punctual question: what is the size for our
small icons, 24x24 as in GNOME HIG
(http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gup/hig/2.0/icons-types.html) or
22x22 as in Tango
(http://tango.freedesktop.org/Tango_Icon_Theme_Guidelines#Small) ?
--
nicu
Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/
Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org
my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro
More information about the Fedora-art-list
mailing list