Form widgets on fpo website

[Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek]

Well, Firefox !=< 3 sucks a little bit.

Dnia 26-12-2007, śro o godzinie 12:47 -0600, Michael Beckwith pisze:
> I'm apparently blind, you're unclear with what you say. From a
> personal standpoint, when someone lists some terms with any reference
> to google, they mean to do searching, not look at the buttons on the
> page. Should have clarified.
> Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek wrote: 
> > You're blind... Google.com has native widgets!
> > 
> > Dnia 25-12-2007, wto o godzinie 18:38 -0600, Michael Beckwith pisze:
> >   
> > > Why should I do a google search for something you're arguing for? I
> > > don't have a problem with what I'm seeing when I visit the page. Just
> > > for the sake of not arguing, I did do a google search for both "native
> > > widgets" and didn't find any sort of examples of what I was asking
> > > for. Maybe I'm just blind, so if you could point one out like I asked,
> > > I'd be happy to click.
> > > -- 
> > >     
> > > ~Michael
> > > http://ridleytx.structed.net (for now)
> > > http://michaelbox.net (eventually) 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Fedora-art-list mailing list
> > > Fedora-art-list at redhat.com
> > > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
> > >     
> > > 
> > > __________________________________________________________________
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Fedora-art-list mailing list
> > > Fedora-art-list at redhat.com
> > > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
> > >     
> For the sake of arguement of why I was, perhaps, not the best person
> to try arguing the point, I attached what I see with most form
> buttons, including google.com. It takes on the colors of my gnome
> theme overall,  using 2.0.0.10 build of FF
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Martin Sourada wrote: 
> > On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 01:38 +0100, Michael Beckwith wrote:
> >   
> > > Why should I do a google search for something you're arguing for? 
> > > I don't have a problem with what I'm seeing when I visit the page. 
> > > Just for the sake of not arguing, I did do a google search for 
> > > both "native widgets" and didn't find any sort of examples of what 
> > > I was asking for. Maybe I'm just blind, so if you could point one 
> > > out like I asked, I'd be happy to click.
> > > 
> > >     
> > 
> > Personally I think he meant the google.com page itself as an example
> > with the "right" widgets. So to show you the differences:
> > this[ff-old.png] is start.fp.o in F8's epiphany, this[ff-native] is
> > start.fp.o in FF3 and this[ff-fpo] is fp.o. I guess you see the
> > difference on first sight ;)
> > 
> > Martin
> 
> 
> -- 
> ~Michael
> http://ridleytx.structed.net (for now)
> http://michaelbox.net (eventually) 
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-art-list mailing list
> Fedora-art-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
-- 
                              __        _                ___ 
Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek        / _|___ __| |___ _ _ __ _  ( _ )
Fedora Project              |  _/ -_) _` / _ \ '_/ _` | / _ \
http://liviopl.jogger.pl/   |_| \___\__,_\___/_| \__,_| \___/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: To jest cz??? wiadomo?ci podpisana cyfrowo
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/attachments/20071226/fffe48ac/attachment.sig>