[Echo] from which icon set derive missing icons?

[Martin Sourada]

On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 20:18 +0200, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 18:56 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > the current state of things in Echo is that we derive first from
> > Clearlooks and then from Gnome. I'd suggest to drop the Clearlooks as
> > the Gnome icon theme has already 22x22 icon set and so we would improve
> > the current situation a lot. Also, I think that the Gnome icon theme
> > styling is closer to Echo than Clearlooks is (and I'd strongly suggest
> > to use Gnome or Tango metaphors rather than Bluecurve ones). It would be
> > especially helpful for action icons as we use mostly the same
> > perspective for these (flat). It has one drawback though (which should
> > be easy to fix) - it uses gnome foot instead of fedora logo for the
> > menu. Any thoughts on this? 
> 
> Having Clearlooks in the inheritance chain will not make a big
> difference either way, since it is just a handful of icons:
> 
> [mclasen at localhost examples]$ find /usr/share/icons/Clearlooks/ -name
> *.png | wc -l
> 31
> 
But it seems it pulls Bluecurve in as well. When I disabled it a lot
icons previously blurry are now OK, I didn't checked whether they are
pulled from Clearlooks or Bluecurve though (some examples are
dictionary, gimp, inkscape, take screenshot...).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/attachments/20070928/6b6175a6/attachment.sig>