FUDCon Boston Artwork

[Rahul Sundaram]

Max Spevack wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> 
>> I think the one with the pru in it (design #1) is better. You could 
>> consider it final I think. The only concern is that it's derived from 
>> a Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0 Generic photo. Is that okay? If not I 
>> can probably go out and shoot some photos of the skyline and redo this 
>> weekend.
> 
> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/
> 
> So we're not going to sell the shirts and admission to FUDCon is free, 
> which means that it's not "commercial".

Well the "non-commercial" clause in the CC licenses are problematic for 
various reasons including the issue of defining what exactly is 
considered commercial activity. I think using a different picture that 
allows commercial activity is better.

Rahul