Fedora-art-list Digest, Vol 31, Issue 35

[SAM]

Hii,

this is Abdul Samad Ghanchi, I am from Pakistan, and interested in ART and
got command on PHOTOSHOP, Hope i contribute my best for FEDORA...

Regards
gHanchi2oOo

On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:50 AM, <fedora-art-list-request at redhat.com>wrote:

> Send Fedora-art-list mailing list submissions to
>        fedora-art-list at redhat.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        fedora-art-list-request at redhat.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        fedora-art-list-owner at redhat.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Fedora-art-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Becoming a contributor (Alec Moon)
>   2. Re: Echo Icon Theme in F10? (Martin Sourada)
>   3. Re: Fedora Remix mark (Paul W. Frields)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:49:11 -0500
> From: "Alec Moon" <moonman36 at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Becoming a contributor
> To: fedora-art-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID:
>        <b0bc05cd0810151149l2d5066eagcd9cc5814431f5c6 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Actually, because of the incompleteness of the list, I wasn't completely
> sure which projects were still open. I was interested in the Fedora USB
> distrobution Kit, though, as it looked like nobody has been working on it.
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:00 AM, <fedora-art-list-request at redhat.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Send Fedora-art-list mailing list submissions to
> >        fedora-art-list at redhat.com
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >        http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >        fedora-art-list-request at redhat.com
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >        fedora-art-list-owner at redhat.com
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Fedora-art-list digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >   1. Re: Fedora 10 promo video (draft) (Nicu Buculei)
> >   2. F10 artwork questions (Bill Nottingham)
> >   3. Re: Becoming a contributor (Nicu Buculei)
> >   4. Re: F10 artwork questions (Nicu Buculei)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:50:39 +0300
> > From: Nicu Buculei <nicu_fedora at nicubunu.ro>
> > Subject: Re: Fedora 10 promo video (draft)
> > To: Fedora Art List <fedora-art-list at redhat.com>
> > Message-ID: <48F5D90F.4010706 at nicubunu.ro>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> >
> > Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 09:17 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> > >> I also think it's very hard to make a "short" list with features to
> > outline
> > >
> > > We have made such a list in Marketing already:
> > >
> >
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2008-September/msg00183.html
> >
> > I know about that list... it was my indirect way of pointing that a new
> > desktop theme is a *minor* feature (even if it is the most talked part
> > in reviews).
> >
> > > Hmm.  Do we require simply FOSS-made materials, or specifically
> > > Fedora-made materials?
> >
> > Well, if we don't allow software from rpmfusion then we are SOL, no
> > videos beyond screen captures made with Istanbul or recorded from webcam
> > with Cheese.
> >
> > Effectively not even "I am Fedora" -
> > http://s6.video2.blip.tv/0570000043336/Mairin-IAmFedora740.ogg
> >
> > --
> > nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
> > Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/
> > Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org
> > my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:19:07 -0400
> > From: Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com>
> > Subject: F10 artwork questions
> > To: fedora-art-list at redhat.com
> > Message-ID: <20081015151907.GH1773 at nostromo.devel.redhat.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >
> > Some general questions:
> >
> > When is it going to land for integration and review? Time is ticking...
> > (Also, is it known late this release, and scheduled to be earlier
> > in future releases?)
> >
> > The poster on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/F10Themes/Solar -
> > it doesn't appear to be valid English, certainly not in the header.
> > And I'm not sure what "an all branded new way of technology" is.
> >
> > Finally, not to start too much controversy - is there a reason the
> > *final* theme voting is Art-only?
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:23:32 +0300
> > From: Nicu Buculei <nicu_fedora at nicubunu.ro>
> > Subject: Re: Becoming a contributor
> > To: Fedora Art List <fedora-art-list at redhat.com>
> > Message-ID: <48F60AF4.8000107 at nicubunu.ro>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> >
> > Alec Moon wrote:
> > > I have had some experience working with Photoshop, starting at verson
> 6,
> > > all the way to CS 3. I'm also experienced with GIMP. I like to do
> > > projects with a clear goal. I like abstract art more than realism. I'm
> > > very open to any sort of project.
> >
> > Hi Alec,
> >
> > Do you find something interesting in our open requests queue?
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/DesignService
> >
> > Note: our preferred applications are GIMP and Inkscape and a definite
> > must is file formats which can be opened with FOSS tools (GIMP and
> > Inkscape).
> >
> > --
> > nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
> > Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/
> > Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org
> > my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 4
> > Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:38:53 +0300
> > From: Nicu Buculei <nicu_fedora at nicubunu.ro>
> > Subject: Re: F10 artwork questions
> > To: Fedora Art List <fedora-art-list at redhat.com>
> > Message-ID: <48F60E8D.5030006 at nicubunu.ro>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> >
> > Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > Some general questions:
> > >
> > > When is it going to land for integration and review? Time is ticking...
> > > (Also, is it known late this release, and scheduled to be earlier
> > > in future releases?)
> >
> > As I understand, the final Solar images received OK and are ready for
> > packaging. I am not familiar with the process of going from wiki to
> > package.
> >
> > > The poster on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/F10Themes/Solar -
> > > it doesn't appear to be valid English, certainly not in the header.
> > > And I'm not sure what "an all branded new way of technology" is.
> >
> > The post is not part of the release and should not be a blocker for
> > packaging (and I agree with you, its wording can be improved - we don't
> > have a better text from marketing).
> >
> > > Finally, not to start too much controversy - is there a reason the
> > > *final* theme voting is Art-only?
> >
> > It may not be the best link but
> > http://mihmo.livejournal.com/62031.html?thread=331343#t331343
> >
> > We were not supposed to have a vote but decide the final theme by
> > consensus, only that for this release a consensus was not reached so we
> > had to use an internal vote.
> >
> > --
> > nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
> > Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/
> > Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org
> > my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Fedora-art-list mailing list
> > Fedora-art-list at redhat.com
> > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
> >
> >
> > End of Fedora-art-list Digest, Vol 31, Issue 33
> > ***********************************************
> >
>
>
>
> --
> The glass just broke all over my kitchen floor!
> That, my friends, is why Harley-Davidson motorcycles taste bad.
>
> -Alec-
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/attachments/20081015/d85b1e05/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:07:09 +0200
> From: Martin Sourada <martin.sourada at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Echo Icon Theme in F10?
> To: Fedora Art List <fedora-art-list at redhat.com>
> Cc: Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop
>        <fedora-desktop-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <1224097629.2820.33.camel at pc-notebook>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> First of all, thanks for the review, it pretty much outlines the issues
> I feel uneasy about as well. First, most of these issues are caused by
> SVG icon being scaled down (sometimes for a reason unknown to me and
> sometimes because of missing appropriate size variant). So I skip these,
> because we need to just finish other size and adjust them a little to
> keep them in sync with other icons. I seriously doubt we'll fix those in
> time for F10.
>
> Now, for the rest.
>
> The delete icon - yes, it looks different and I proposed we change it to
> something other. The discussion was postponed for after F10 release.
>
> The close icon on tabs - yes, it is chopped off and I don't understand
> why. It has correct size and the icon itself isn't chopped off, but in
> *some* applications it looks this way :-/
>
> The door icon - the doors are slightly opened, perhaps too little, and
> behind there is a black space. The two pixel width outline is because
> both door and the door-hole has it's own outline. I agree, it might need
> improvement.
>
> System->Administration - yep, it probably needs rework to better fit
> with the style.
>
> Shut Down - dunno if you remember, but at the time it was being created
> there were a lot of submission and for some reason we chose this on. But
> even after a half a year (IIRC) of seeing it everyday it looks a bit
> weird me.
>
> Network - yep, an old style one. We need to use the new styled monitors
> for these...
>
> Palm - agreed
>
> Volume - I accepted it back when we were creating it, but it seems to me
> it actually uses different perspective from other icons...
>
> Firefox, Thunderbird, OpenOffice = pain, while firefox being the best...
> Basically the toolbar icons are pretty much themable in firefox,
> thunderbird needs theme, openoffice needs theme. Not a decent citizens.
> Seeing that our mail client of choice is Evolution though, which works
> good with Echo, I'd guess Thuderbird hasn't the highest priority (and it
> does not even fit with the F9 default icon theme). For openoffice we
> would probably need to symlink/copy the echo icons into echo icon theme
> for openoffice... I don't know, how they handle it.
>
> I'd very much like to hear Luya's opinion, but I don't feel like
> supporting Echo for F10 as default much longer...
>
> Martin
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 197 bytes
> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
> Url :
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/attachments/20081015/d445b353/attachment.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:50:32 +0000
> From: "Paul W. Frields" <stickster at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Fedora Remix mark
> To: fedora-advisory-board at redhat.com
> Cc: fedora-art-list <fedora-art-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID:
>        <1224100232.22899.81.camel at victoria-eth.internal.frields.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 15:40 -0400, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Jesse Keating wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 15:54 +0000, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > >> This is the page where I collected your contributions to a design.
>  The
> > >> time's come for me to refer the design candidates to the Board for
> > >> approval.
> > >
> > > Yay art opinions!
> > >
> > > So, I strongly dislike what is done to the R of Remix in "13".  Maybe
> my
> > > eyes suck, but it just looks like something went wrong when drawing the
> > > R.
> > >
> > > Overall I think I prefer the rounded 9, although I can't tell much
> > > difference between it and all the choices from Jay and Nicu, except for
> > > the (mis)spelling of "remix", and well, COLORS!
> > >
> > > I'd prefer something like 9, with remix spelled correctly, and as many
> > > color options as possible.
> >
> > I don't suppose we could just defer to the Fedora Art team to make a
> > decision, since we have set them up to be the authoritative voice on
> > precisely these kinds of matters?
> >
> > I'd rather see Mo/Nicu/et al making the call than Jesse.  Not that I
> don't
> > love Jesse.  ;)
>
> I'm OK with that call.  I think the rounded banner definitely works best
> in everyone's opinion as being more thematically related to the font
> choices.  So Artwork team, what do you say?
>
> --
> Paul W. Frields
>  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
>  http://paul.frields.org/   -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
>  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
> Url :
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/attachments/20081015/5838dca2/attachment.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-art-list mailing list
> Fedora-art-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
>
>
> End of Fedora-art-list Digest, Vol 31, Issue 35
> ***********************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/attachments/20081016/01465539/attachment.htm>