Round 3 theme and fedora-fr community

Marco Mornati mmornati at byte-code.com
Tue Sep 23 19:14:58 UTC 2008


Yes... maybe you are right. But I think that anyway theme could have
some mods also after vote. But it's true that, for example with
Invixible theme, if you decide to change the katana, maybe the result
couldn't be beautiful like current version.

Marco


On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 11:06 -0700, Klaatu wrote:
> I was frankly confused on what I was voting on, which is why I asked
> for clarification on this in the first place.  I did not want to vote
> on InvinXible as it was only to have a different sword in the final
> product.  I didn't mean to wait til the last minute, I jsut didn't
> understand why in the last moments, the final version of the art --
> with the new sword -- had not yet been developed.
> 
> It wasn't an effort to pick on Samuele, it was just an effort to vote
> on something I felt comfortable and safe on voting for.
> 
> - klaatu
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:54 AM, Máirín Duffy
> <duffy at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>         Hi Marco,
>         
>         
>         Marco Mornati wrote:
>                 Yes... I'm in agreement with you Máirín... we can't
>                 have a NO.Licenses
>                 Image inside Fedora... that it's completely free!
>                 
>                 My question is... why now? There are user voting also
>                 Invinxible
>                 theme... and are all lost. There were a licensing
>                 doubt over that
>                 theme... why it's in the final round?
>         
>         
>         This is absolutely not last-minute. I brought up licensing
>         concerns to Samuele weeks ago on this very list and he assured
>         me he was switching any photos with bad licenses to other ones
>         with good licenses. I am really angry that I was misled.
>         
>         Here is the thread from the archives:
>         
>         http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/2008-August/msg00326.html
>         
>         That message was posted four weeks ago. It would have given
>         Samuele plenty of time to replace the imagery, which he said
>         he was doing:
>         
>         http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/2008-August/msg00334.html
>         
>         
>         
>         ~m
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         Fedora-art-list mailing list
>         Fedora-art-list at redhat.com
>         http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
>         
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ---
> uzu linukso. subtenu libera programaro.
> kotizu al http://www.thebadapples.info/ogg.xml
> http://www.thebadapples.info/fedorareloaded/ogg.xml
> 
> 
-- 
Dott. Ing. Mornati Marco
Byte-Code s.r.l
via Antonio Cechov, 1
San Giuliano Milanese (MI)
E-Mail: mmornati at byte-code.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/attachments/20080923/aface936/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-art-list mailing list