Issues on x86_64 host

Matthias Saou thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net
Mon Apr 25 18:58:04 UTC 2005


seth vidal wrote :

> > (sorry if things get all wrapped around :-/)
> > 
> > Now the other weird thing is that if I "manually" use "mach rpm -ivh" for
> > all those exact packages, it works fine. It seems that it fails only
> > through yum :-( Given the trivial content of some of these scriplets, I'm
> > really confused! The glibc-kernheaders which fails the same way is :
> 
> > I really don't see how that manages to fail :-(
> > If I try to "mach chroot" after manually installing what is missing from
> > the "minimal" group, it works, but "yum groupinstall build-base" then
> > fails with other packages, same for the main build group.
> > 
> > Any ideas? Seth, you're building packages on an x86_64, aren't you?
> 
> is selinux disabled?

Yes, it was set to "Warn" at installation time.

Matthias

-- 
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) - Linux kernel 2.6.11-1.14_FC3
Load : 1.87 1.28 0.72




More information about the Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list