Mock going forward

[Jesse Keating]

On Wednesday 16 August 2006 14:30, Clark Williams wrote:
> Keeping in line with our razor-blade focus for mock ("we just build
> packages in chroots"), I actually don't think there's much more to do
> for 1.0. Once we are comfortable with the functional and security
> aspects of the 0.7 mock, I'd call it cooked. Assuming of course no one
> comes up with a killer feature that is :).

I'd be happy to see a 1.0 mock in FC7 released (:

Once 0.7 settles down a bit, I'd really like to get Red Hat's buildsystem guys 
to beat up on it and see if we can get anything they need upstream before 1.0 
so that when upstream mock goes 1.0, Red Hat can consume 1.0 and runwith an 
unmodified mock.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-buildsys-list/attachments/20060816/c25c14ae/attachment.sig>