mock SELinux policy as RPM package
Michael_E_Brown at dell.com
Michael_E_Brown at dell.com
Thu Aug 17 18:54:59 UTC 2006
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-buildsys-list-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:fedora-buildsys-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of
> Clark Williams
> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 10:56 AM
> To: Discussion of Fedora build system
> Subject: Re: mock SELinux policy as RPM package
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the question of a package of the mock SELinux policy from
> >
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/MockTricks
> >
> > has come up a few times in the past, and I have made an RPM
> package for
> > my own use some time ago:
> >
> > http://n-dimensional.de/software/mock-selinux-policy/
> >
> > It doesn't have all the bells and whistles Paul Howarth has
> mentioned in
> >
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SELinux/PolicyMo
> dules yet
> > (my package predates that document by several weeks), but
> should be too
> > difficult to adapt if someone is interested.
> >
> > (This is my second try to post here as my last message seems to have
> > been eaten by the moderation system.)
> >
> > Gruß,
> >
>
>
> - From a quick read of the Wiki, it looks like there are packages that
> fail to build on FC5 hosts due to policy problems (I didn't realize
> that). This means to me that we should add a loadable policy
> module as
> part of the mock package.
>
> Seth, Michael, Dan, et al, what do you guys think?
I think it would be a good idea to package an selinux policy directly in with the mock package. This would give people a good starting place for tweaking if they have problems, and encourage them to send their fixes upstream.
Hans policy might be a good starting point if it passes review by somebody who knows more about selinux than I do.
--
Michael
More information about the Fedora-buildsys-list
mailing list