New version of mock working (I think)

Clark Williams williams at redhat.com
Mon Jun 26 20:06:56 UTC 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Michael_E_Brown at Dell.com wrote:
>
> Yes, feedback from Dan would be good. My initial thoughts are that a
> client implementation would be best at this point, due to the security
> implications of a server. Something where we call a server API provided
> by plague like:
>     server.begin_mock_status( "my.src.rpm", MY_PID)
>     server.set_mock_status( "my.src.rpm", "status_string", MY_PID)
>     ...
>     server.end_mock_status( "my.src.rpm", return_code, MY_PID)
>

Ah, and you thought I really *meant* it when I said I'd shut up. Ha!

Don't you think that a simple server where we just have a listen
socket  and respond to "what's your status?" would be more straight
forward?

>>
>> Just for 2cents, I'd like to make sure we don't forget the
>> other use cases of mock:
>>
>> 1. in brew
>
> I don't know what brew is. Link?
>

I wasn't sure if brew used mock. It's the RHEL build system.


Clark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEoD5fHyuj/+TTEp0RAtqWAKC0ltOzM0+GBTb1Ss9GR23XHqVMUwCfdi/d
uBGXAWEzercmDocQlYBwT1M=
=lANN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list