New version of mock working (I think)

[Clark Williams]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

seth vidal wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 10:13 -0500, Clark Williams wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Jeremy Katz wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 10:12 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
>>>> I hate to throw water on the fire, but to me XML-RPC seems like a
>>>> sledgehammer.  There's actually a ton of code in xmlrpclib.py and for
>>>> this specific instance of pushing status information back to a
>>>> controlling process, I think it's somewhat heavy-handed.
>>> And I'll just pick this point in the thread to say that I agree with
>>> dcbw here....   KISS goes a long way.  And while we can say that it's
>>> configurable and you enable it if you want or don't if not -- that's
>>> then two code paths for status to have to keep working and ensure we
>>> don't break as well as maintaining them for some time
>>>
>> So where were you guys when I was playing Horatius at the bridge? :)
>>
>
> I'd like to take this opportunity to point to lesscode.org
>
> thanks,
> -sv

Thanks for that link.

Clark

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEoVjaHyuj/+TTEp0RAudxAJ49NekRv0HFiauK1OP7ya1+MQD0twCdHLS7
ymeHY1y8p9TE6179JYvhcjY=
=Zums
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----