mock buildroot definitions

[Tim Powers]

On Mar 28, 2006, at 10:05 AM, seth vidal wrote:

> Hey,
>  So it was brought up a while ago that due to the changing nature  
> of the
> comps.xml format that we should not rely on it for the buildroot
> installations in mock. The idea a while back was to just have a
> 'buildroot' rpm that required all the stuff that would normally be in
> the comps.xml group. Then we could just install that rpm and it  
> pulls in
> the rest of the buildroot components.
>
> What do folks think? Worth going through the process to do it?

Out of curiosity, why can't mock just use the same format it has been  
using?

Why is it dependent on what's being used elsewhere?

Tim