mock buildroot definitions
seth vidal
skvidal at linux.duke.edu
Wed Mar 29 00:19:06 UTC 2006
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 11:51 -0500, Mike McLean wrote:
> Chris Weyl wrote:
> > I like the idea, if it makes things more stable for a plague
> > implementation. How would it be handled tho? Different rpms for the
> > different groups? (e.g., buildsys-base, buildsys-minimal, etc, etc)
> > Or one big rpm?
>
> If we pursue this I recommend we use a more isolated naming scheme.
> Someone might conceivably want to build a real package named
> buildsys-base. Perhaps mock-abstract-group-{base,minimal,...}
just easier to have them as variables of: base, minimal, build
> I would like to have the original behavior available via configuration.
> Surely yum will continue to have a groupinstall command.
why would you want to continue to support the buildgroups.xml file
format in mock? What does it benefit to maintain both sets of the code?
-sv
More information about the Fedora-buildsys-list
mailing list