pungi doesn't run

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Thu Mar 6 01:49:46 UTC 2008


On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 18:13 -0600, Allen Rohner wrote:
> Thanks for the help. I'm able to get farther now. It doesn't really
> make sense to me why the list is the way it is. Is that truly the
> minimal set of packages? Why do we need iscsi-initiator-utils and
> vncserver to build a working ISO? This process would be significantly
> easier if the (true) minimum set of packages was documented somewhere,
> or even better, if pungi warned that you are missing packages X,Y,Z
> necessary to get a working build. I would offer to make a patch, but I
> don't know what the set is.

That depends on if you want to install to iscsi, or support vnc
installs.  Again, because pungi doesn't split out what you need to
compose the install media vs what you have as install choices on the
media, the media can get a bit bloaty.  I just haven't come up with a
good way of expressing one vs the other.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-buildsys-list/attachments/20080305/76db40c8/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list