Koji "hidden" packages proposal
seth vidal
skvidal at fedoraproject.org
Mon Mar 17 14:13:04 UTC 2008
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 21:58 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> What im talking about was the proposal put forward when we had the buildsys
> meeting the proposal that we all said sounded like the way to move forward.
> This is not that proposal. importing packages is the one thing that hurts
> koji from getting wider use outside of fedora. Some people will import the
> data. Most do not want to. Fedora will be mirroring RHEL content from RHN,
> people outside of fedora will be mirroring fedora and building on top of
> that.
>
I'm not sure I see the problem here, necessarily.
okay here's how I see what Mike's proposal does and then what we
eventually want to do:
Mike's Proposal:
- gives us a way of building from the reposync'd rhel-trees that we now
have on puppet1 w/o distributing these pkgs out to the world. Yay
- gives us a way of building epel in koji so we can finally disable
plague, also yay.
The eventual future:
- have a way of koji to build from an arbitrary set of remote repos
by:
1. syncing down the repodata from those remote repos and 'faking'
an import
2. creating its own local repo out of the remote repos (or
micro-repos) for external use.
There's nothing mutually exclusive about these two items and, afaict,
there's no requirement that they be done at the same time, either.
I guess in short:
- Dennis: I think your suggestion is one we should do but we do not
require it immediately.
- Mike: The proposal sounds round enough to me. We've already got all
of the production repos(no betas) in rhn for rhel4 and 5 for i386,
x86_64 and ppc* synced over on puppet1. They resync every night. Is
there anything else you need that I missed?
-sv
More information about the Fedora-buildsys-list
mailing list