From sergio at sergiomb.no-ip.org Sat Aug 1 02:21:22 2009 From: sergio at sergiomb.no-ip.org (Sergio Monteiro Basto) Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2009 03:21:22 +0100 Subject: pungi recent bug In-Reply-To: <1247997426.4880.17.camel@segulix> References: <1247776539.7936.22.camel@segulix> <1247780673.3012.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1247958112.12466.28.camel@segulix> <485F2C4D-2B6F-4DBF-8DCA-3970381B7AA2@j2solutions.net> <1247997426.4880.17.camel@segulix> Message-ID: <1249093282.2504.48.camel@segulix> On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 10:57 +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: > > > That's the log I can get for wormux. > > > > > > > > So you exclude wormux but not wormux-data? > yes, to just exclude wormux, I think just appears wormux in duplicates > and also is enough to solve the duplicated. Hi, updating the information : I build pungi-2.0.16 reverting this commit : http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/pungi.git?p=pungi.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=44c4028447884828e01ff3769962011bc53c428d and can confirm this commit is the one which breaks my "builds" . About seeing logs, I just found extend logs recently and if you want see it too: http://sergiomb.no-ip.org/f11/logs/i386.log Analyzing logs: wormux-data is repeated and not detect by checkduplicated because one is .i586 and other is .noarch (for example in 64 bits I can have same package in .i586 and in .x86_64 and they aren't duplicated) Pungi.INFO: Checking deps of wormux.i586 yum.verbose.YumBase.DEBUG: Matched wormux-data-0.8.2-5.fc11.i586 to require for wormux-data yum.verbose.YumBase.DEBUG: Matched wormux-data-0.8.3-1.fc11.noarch to require for wormux-data Pungi.INFO: Added wormux-data.noarch for wormux.i586 Pungi.INFO: Added wormux-data.i586 for wormux.i586 this looks (to me) wrong. hope that can help Thanks, -- S?rgio M. B. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 2192 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jkeating at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 19:01:16 2009 From: jkeating at redhat.com (Jesse Keating) Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 12:01:16 -0700 Subject: Creating a custom distro with pungi In-Reply-To: <1248374662.19980.4.camel@Julians-Notebook> References: <1248374662.19980.4.camel@Julians-Notebook> Message-ID: <1249412476.18316.45.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 20:44 +0200, Julian Aloofi wrote: > I'm currently trying to create a custom distro with pungi. More > precisely, I've been using rpm -qa --qf="%{n}\n" to create a list of > packages currently installed on my system, added the needed repos > (rpmfusion-free, rpmfusion-free-updates and adobe-linux-i386) and built > a kickstart file out of this. Now I have some questions, and it's pretty > hard to find any documentation about that, so I thought I'd just ask on > this list. > > 1.)How can I specify which packages should be installed by default? > The packages in my kickstart file get added, but don't get installed by > default. I figured out that it had something to do with some xml files, > but what exactly do I have to do to, for example, install all packages > from the kickstart file by default? I'm not so comfortable with anaconda > and repo files, so please mention file locations if I have to edit some > files. You would have to modify the comps xml file to list the packages you wish installed and set them to manditory or default. The graphical package selection is generated via this file which lists the various categories, groups, and packages within the groups. > 2.)How can I replace fedora-logos, fedora-release and > fedora-release-notes with generic-logos, generic-release and > generic-release-notes? I tried to exclude them from repos in the > kickstart file and excluding them from the package manifest, however it > didn't work. > This I'm not familiar with, I haven't tried doing it with pungi. I'd have to look a bit deeper into it. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom? is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From jkeating at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 19:07:16 2009 From: jkeating at redhat.com (Jesse Keating) Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 12:07:16 -0700 Subject: pungi recent bug In-Reply-To: <1249093282.2504.48.camel@segulix> References: <1247776539.7936.22.camel@segulix> <1247780673.3012.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1247958112.12466.28.camel@segulix> <485F2C4D-2B6F-4DBF-8DCA-3970381B7AA2@j2solutions.net> <1247997426.4880.17.camel@segulix> <1249093282.2504.48.camel@segulix> Message-ID: <1249412836.18316.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 03:21 +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: > On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 10:57 +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: > > > > That's the log I can get for wormux. > > > > > > > > > > > > So you exclude wormux but not wormux-data? > > yes, to just exclude wormux, I think just appears wormux in duplicates > > and also is enough to solve the duplicated. > > Hi, updating the information : > > I build pungi-2.0.16 reverting this commit : > http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/pungi.git?p=pungi.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=44c4028447884828e01ff3769962011bc53c428d > and can confirm this commit is the one which breaks my "builds" . > > About seeing logs, I just found extend logs recently and if you want see > it too: http://sergiomb.no-ip.org/f11/logs/i386.log > > Analyzing logs: > wormux-data is repeated and not detect by checkduplicated because one > is .i586 and other is .noarch (for example in 64 bits I can have same > package in .i586 and in .x86_64 and they aren't duplicated) > > Pungi.INFO: Checking deps of wormux.i586 > yum.verbose.YumBase.DEBUG: Matched wormux-data-0.8.2-5.fc11.i586 to require for wormux-data > yum.verbose.YumBase.DEBUG: Matched wormux-data-0.8.3-1.fc11.noarch to require for wormux-data > Pungi.INFO: Added wormux-data.noarch for wormux.i586 > Pungi.INFO: Added wormux-data.i586 for wormux.i586 > > this looks (to me) wrong. > > hope that can help > Thanks, Ah, that's interesting. Since the arch changed, using the yum API call to find the best matches by arch means we'll get both matches. I'll need to look into that and work with seth to find a better API call to use here. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom? is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Tue Aug 4 19:12:13 2009 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (Seth Vidal) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:12:13 -0400 (EDT) Subject: pungi recent bug In-Reply-To: <1249412836.18316.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1247776539.7936.22.camel@segulix> <1247780673.3012.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1247958112.12466.28.camel@segulix> <485F2C4D-2B6F-4DBF-8DCA-3970381B7AA2@j2solutions.net> <1247997426.4880.17.camel@segulix> <1249093282.2504.48.camel@segulix> <1249412836.18316.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 03:21 +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: >> On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 10:57 +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: >>>>> That's the log I can get for wormux. >>>>> >>> >>>> >>>> So you exclude wormux but not wormux-data? >>> yes, to just exclude wormux, I think just appears wormux in duplicates >>> and also is enough to solve the duplicated. >> >> Hi, updating the information : >> >> I build pungi-2.0.16 reverting this commit : >> http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/pungi.git?p=pungi.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=44c4028447884828e01ff3769962011bc53c428d >> and can confirm this commit is the one which breaks my "builds" . >> >> About seeing logs, I just found extend logs recently and if you want see >> it too: http://sergiomb.no-ip.org/f11/logs/i386.log >> >> Analyzing logs: >> wormux-data is repeated and not detect by checkduplicated because one >> is .i586 and other is .noarch (for example in 64 bits I can have same >> package in .i586 and in .x86_64 and they aren't duplicated) >> >> Pungi.INFO: Checking deps of wormux.i586 >> yum.verbose.YumBase.DEBUG: Matched wormux-data-0.8.2-5.fc11.i586 to require for wormux-data >> yum.verbose.YumBase.DEBUG: Matched wormux-data-0.8.3-1.fc11.noarch to require for wormux-data >> Pungi.INFO: Added wormux-data.noarch for wormux.i586 >> Pungi.INFO: Added wormux-data.i586 for wormux.i586 >> >> this looks (to me) wrong. >> >> hope that can help >> Thanks, > > Ah, that's interesting. Since the arch changed, using the yum API call > to find the best matches by arch means we'll get both matches. I'll > need to look into that and work with seth to find a better API call to > use here. > If you add a version-specific dep for wormux-data to the wormux package does the problem go away? and why do we have 2 wormux-data's in the tree? -sv From jkeating at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 19:37:56 2009 From: jkeating at redhat.com (Jesse Keating) Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 12:37:56 -0700 Subject: pungi recent bug In-Reply-To: References: <1247776539.7936.22.camel@segulix> <1247780673.3012.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1247958112.12466.28.camel@segulix> <485F2C4D-2B6F-4DBF-8DCA-3970381B7AA2@j2solutions.net> <1247997426.4880.17.camel@segulix> <1249093282.2504.48.camel@segulix> <1249412836.18316.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1249414676.18316.53.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 15:12 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: > > If you add a version-specific dep for wormux-data to the wormux > package > does the problem go away? > > and why do we have 2 wormux-data's in the tree? One is likely in the Everything tree, and another in the updates tree. One is i586, one is noarch. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom? is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Tue Aug 4 19:38:05 2009 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (Seth Vidal) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:38:05 -0400 (EDT) Subject: pungi recent bug In-Reply-To: <1249414676.18316.53.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1247776539.7936.22.camel@segulix> <1247780673.3012.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1247958112.12466.28.camel@segulix> <485F2C4D-2B6F-4DBF-8DCA-3970381B7AA2@j2solutions.net> <1247997426.4880.17.camel@segulix> <1249093282.2504.48.camel@segulix> <1249412836.18316.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1249414676.18316.53.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 15:12 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: >> >> If you add a version-specific dep for wormux-data to the wormux >> package >> does the problem go away? >> >> and why do we have 2 wormux-data's in the tree? > > One is likely in the Everything tree, and another in the updates tree. > One is i586, one is noarch. so if the dep is just 'Requires: wormux-data' then pungi/yum is doing the right thing by pulling in all arches of the same pkg. Much like it would do for glibc.i586, i686, etc. version-specific Requires would, i think, fix it. other suggestions welcome. -sv From jkeating at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 20:34:46 2009 From: jkeating at redhat.com (Jesse Keating) Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:34:46 -0700 Subject: pungi recent bug In-Reply-To: References: <1247776539.7936.22.camel@segulix> <1247780673.3012.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1247958112.12466.28.camel@segulix> <485F2C4D-2B6F-4DBF-8DCA-3970381B7AA2@j2solutions.net> <1247997426.4880.17.camel@segulix> <1249093282.2504.48.camel@segulix> <1249412836.18316.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1249414676.18316.53.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1249418086.18316.64.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 15:38 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: > so if the dep is just 'Requires: wormux-data' then pungi/yum is doing the > right thing by pulling in all arches of the same pkg. Much like it would > do for glibc.i586, i686, etc. > > version-specific Requires would, i think, fix it. > > other suggestions welcome. Only thing I could come up with is some hack in pungi to consider noarch and any other binary arch the same enough so that you only get the highest n-v-r in those cases. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom? is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Tue Aug 4 20:46:29 2009 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (Seth Vidal) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:46:29 -0400 (EDT) Subject: pungi recent bug In-Reply-To: <1249418086.18316.64.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1247776539.7936.22.camel@segulix> <1247780673.3012.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1247958112.12466.28.camel@segulix> <485F2C4D-2B6F-4DBF-8DCA-3970381B7AA2@j2solutions.net> <1247997426.4880.17.camel@segulix> <1249093282.2504.48.camel@segulix> <1249412836.18316.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1249414676.18316.53.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1249418086.18316.64.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 15:38 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: >> so if the dep is just 'Requires: wormux-data' then pungi/yum is doing the >> right thing by pulling in all arches of the same pkg. Much like it would >> do for glibc.i586, i686, etc. >> >> version-specific Requires would, i think, fix it. >> >> other suggestions welcome. > > Only thing I could come up with is some hack in pungi to consider noarch > and any other binary arch the same enough so that you only get the > highest n-v-r in those cases. fair enough. We might be able to make this change in yum, too - provided we never get into a place where we have: pkg for x86_64 == foo.x86_64 pkg for i686 == foo.noarch and that be quasi-legit. I only mention it b/c I can imagine such requests :) -sv From kanarip at kanarip.com Tue Aug 4 20:52:26 2009 From: kanarip at kanarip.com (Jeroen van Meeuwen) Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 22:52:26 +0200 Subject: pungi recent bug Message-ID: <1249418086.18316.64.camel@localhost.localdomain> Actually only yum will do the right thing by appreciating the multiblib setting, defaulting to best arches, whereas pungi will pull in 'all that provides wormux-data' -- Jeroen @ android Jesse Keating wrote: >On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 15:38 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: >> so if the dep is just 'Requires: wormux-data' then pungi/yum is doing the >> right thing by pulling in all arches of the same pkg. Much like it would >> do for glibc.i586, i686, etc. >> >> version-specific Requires would, i think, fix it. >> >> other suggestions welcome. > >Only thing I could come up with is some hack in pungi to consider noarch >and any other binary arch the same enough so that you only get the >highest n-v-r in those cases. > >-- >Jesse Keating >Fedora -- Freedom? is a feature! >identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating >-- >Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list >Fedora-buildsys-list at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list From sergio at sergiomb.no-ip.org Thu Aug 6 17:10:07 2009 From: sergio at sergiomb.no-ip.org (Sergio Monteiro Basto) Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:10:07 +0100 Subject: pungi recent bug In-Reply-To: References: <1247776539.7936.22.camel@segulix> <1247780673.3012.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1247958112.12466.28.camel@segulix> <485F2C4D-2B6F-4DBF-8DCA-3970381B7AA2@j2solutions.net> <1247997426.4880.17.camel@segulix> <1249093282.2504.48.camel@segulix> <1249412836.18316.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1249578607.6314.12.camel@segulix> On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 15:12 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: > > and why do we have 2 wormux-data's in the tree? I use os/Packages from Fedora 11 and updates, for "my builds", I try to make a "respin", so we have 2 trees , not like rawhide. Anyway I think , the mixed up of packages archs , raise another bug, which my "checkduplicated" don't catch. When I tried building using os and updates always appears some duplicateds, for example in fedora 11. -abrt-0.0.3-1.fc11.i586 -abrt-plugin-kerneloopsreporter-0.0.3-1.fc11.i586 -anthy-9100h-2.fc11.i586 -anthy-devel-9100h-2.fc11.i586 -csound-5.03.0-21.fc11.i586 -csound-dssi-5.03.0-21.fc11.i586 -csound-fltk-5.03.0-21.fc11.i586 -csound-fluidsynth-5.03.0-21.fc11.i586 -csound-jack-5.03.0-21.fc11.i586 -csound-java-5.03.0-21.fc11.i586 -csound-osc-5.03.0-21.fc11.i586 -csound-python-5.03.0-21.fc11.i586 -csound-tk-5.03.0-21.fc11.i586 -csound-virtual-keyboard-5.03.0-21.fc11.i586 -fipscheck-1.1.1-1.fc11.i586 -gcl-2.6.8-0.3.20080902cvs.fc11.i586 -ghc-6.10.1-13.fc11.i586 -ghc-doc-6.10.1-13.fc11.i586 -ghc-prof-6.10.1-13.fc11.i586 -gprolog-1.3.1-3.fc11.i586 -kernel-2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i586 -kernel-PAE-2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686 -liferea-1.4.26-2.fc11.i586 -openchange-0.8.2-1.fc11.i586 -openchange-devel-0.8.2-1.fc11.i586 -qt-4.5.0-14.fc11.i586 -sdcc-2.8.0-5.fc11.i586 -sword-1.5.11-4.fc11.i586 -trustyrc-0.1.2-2.fc11.i586 -wormux-0.8.2-5.fc11.i586 -wormux-data-0.8.2-5.fc11.i586 -plplot-devel-5.9.2-4.fc11.i586 -plplot-libs-5.9.2-4.fc11.i586 -qmf-0.5.752600-5.fc11.i586 -qpidc-0.5.752600-5.fc11.i586 -gauche-0.8.13-3.fc11.i586 -guiloader-2.13.0-2.fc11.i586 -open-vm-tools-0.0.0.154848-3.fc11.i586 -sane-backends-1.0.19-15.fc11.i586 -sane-backends-devel-1.0.19-15.fc11.i586 -sane-backends-libs-1.0.19-15.fc11.i586 -sane-backends-libs-gphoto2-1.0.19-15.fc11.i586 -xulrunner-1.9.1-0.20.beta4.fc11.i586 -xulrunner-devel-1.9.1-0.20.beta4.fc11.i586 -- S?rgio M. B. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 2192 bytes Desc: not available URL: From chenbaozi at gmail.com Thu Aug 13 09:53:37 2009 From: chenbaozi at gmail.com (Chen Baozi) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:53:37 +0800 Subject: any automatic tools for update spec files? Message-ID: hello, I'm wondering whether there is a tool for automatic updating spec files, for example auto-updating the changlog session. Yours, sincerely Chen Baozi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ajax at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 13:30:05 2009 From: ajax at redhat.com (Adam Jackson) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:30:05 -0400 Subject: any automatic tools for update spec files? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1250170205.31009.0.camel@atropine.boston.devel.redhat.com> On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 17:53 +0800, Chen Baozi wrote: > hello, > I'm wondering whether there is a tool for automatic updating spec > files, for example auto-updating the changlog session. For things like automated rebuilds, look at rpmdev-bumpspec(1). - ajax -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From tan20bk at yahoo.com Mon Aug 17 06:42:55 2009 From: tan20bk at yahoo.com (NGUYEN VAN TAN) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:42:55 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Using koji to build Fedora ppc on i386 Message-ID: <235425.55444.qm@web62406.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Hi all, I'm wondering there is possible to build Fedora 9 PPC on an I386 Fedora 9 by using koji. If it is possible how to configure koji to do that. Thank you, "T?t h?n, tho?ng g?n h?n, nhanh h?n -Tr?i nghi?m Yahoo! Mail m?i h?m nay! http://vn.mail.yahoo.com" -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jkeating at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 14:52:45 2009 From: jkeating at redhat.com (Jesse Keating) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:52:45 -0700 Subject: Using koji to build Fedora ppc on i386 In-Reply-To: <235425.55444.qm@web62406.mail.re1.yahoo.com> References: <235425.55444.qm@web62406.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1250520765.2745.53.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 23:42 -0700, NGUYEN VAN TAN wrote: > I'm wondering there is possible to build Fedora 9 PPC on an I386 Fedora 9 by using koji. > If it is possible how to configure koji to do that. Not easily possible. You'd have to be running koji under qemu and make sure all launched process are under qemu, which will make it extremely slow. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom? is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From mikem.rtp at gmail.com Mon Aug 17 14:53:30 2009 From: mikem.rtp at gmail.com (Mike McLean) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:53:30 -0400 Subject: Using koji to build Fedora ppc on i386 In-Reply-To: <235425.55444.qm@web62406.mail.re1.yahoo.com> References: <235425.55444.qm@web62406.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <4f50e0680908170753w6e9d029bi3ffcd84cd9be4b4b@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:42 AM, NGUYEN VAN TAN wrote: > I'm wondering there is possible to build Fedora 9 PPC on an I386 Fedora 9 by > using koji. > If it is possible how to configure koji to do that. At present koji does not support cross compilation, though there was a thread with some patches last month. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-buildsys-list/2009-July/msg00000.html From lixiao-a at 163.com Tue Aug 18 09:38:28 2009 From: lixiao-a at 163.com (lixiao-a) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:38:28 +0800 (CST) Subject: Fedora-buildsys-list Digest, Vol 54, Issue 5 In-Reply-To: <20090817160007.409446195CD@hormel.redhat.com> References: <20090817160007.409446195CD@hormel.redhat.com> Message-ID: <25928892.683761250588308637.JavaMail.coremail@bj163app44.163.com> Hi, I have a koji server running locally at my workplace. Recently, I am unable to execute some koji cli commands. I get the following error: "[kojiadmin at linux-dev koji]$ koji add-user kojira ServerOffline: database outage",anyone can help me?Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lijian.gnu at gmail.com Tue Aug 18 09:47:55 2009 From: lijian.gnu at gmail.com (=?GB2312?B?wO69qA==?=) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:47:55 +0800 Subject: Fedora-buildsys-list Digest, Vol 54, Issue 5 In-Reply-To: <25928892.683761250588308637.JavaMail.coremail@bj163app44.163.com> References: <20090817160007.409446195CD@hormel.redhat.com> <25928892.683761250588308637.JavaMail.coremail@bj163app44.163.com> Message-ID: <426c385a0908180247j35ee877dr3e12c29d9488c2ac@mail.gmail.com> Sometimes, it because your postgresql setting have error: on my host, /etc/koji-hub/hub.conf have some info: ------------------------------------------------ 3 ## Basic options ## 4 DBName = koji 5 DBUser = koji 6 DBHost = 127.0.0.1 7 DBPass = password for user "koji" login datebase "koji" from 127.0.0.1 ========================================================================== good luck. 2009/8/18, lixiao-a : > > Hi, > I have a koji server running locally at my workplace. > Recently, I am unable to execute some koji cli commands. I get the > following error: > > "[kojiadmin at linux-dev koji]$ koji add-user kojira > ServerOffline: database outage",anyone can help me?Thanks. > > > ------------------------------ > ???????????,www.yeah.net > -- > Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list > Fedora-buildsys-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list > -- ?? ?? http://jianlee.ylinux.org msn lijian.gnu at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mikem at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 13:48:28 2009 From: mikem at redhat.com (Mike McLean) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:48:28 -0400 Subject: Fedora-buildsys-list Digest, Vol 54, Issue 5 In-Reply-To: <25928892.683761250588308637.JavaMail.coremail@bj163app44.163.com> References: <20090817160007.409446195CD@hormel.redhat.com> <25928892.683761250588308637.JavaMail.coremail@bj163app44.163.com> Message-ID: <4A8AB12C.6040209@redhat.com> On 08/18/2009 05:38 AM, lixiao-a wrote: > Hi, > I have a koji server running locally at my workplace. > Recently, I am unable to execute some koji cli commands. I get the following error: > > "[kojiadmin at linux-dev koji]$ koji add-user kojira > ServerOffline: database outage",anyone can help me?Thanks. If you're getting this message, the the hub is unable to connect to the database (and hence nothing is going to work). Looking at the httpd error logs might provide a clue as to why. Most likely candidates: - postgres not running - bad/missing db config in hub.conf - postgres not configured to accept the authentication provided by kojihub - DBHost specified in hub.conf, but postgres not configured to accept tcp connections. - network/firewall issues (if db is running elsewhere) From larry.brigman at gmail.com Tue Aug 18 15:46:04 2009 From: larry.brigman at gmail.com (Larry Brigman) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:46:04 -0700 Subject: postgresql-server Message-ID: I have a server running several applications. They typically have the best support for mysql. Is there a hard reason for postgresql-server over mysql for koji? From mikem at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 19:13:04 2009 From: mikem at redhat.com (Mike McLean) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:13:04 -0400 Subject: postgresql-server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4A8AFD40.7000203@redhat.com> On 08/18/2009 11:46 AM, Larry Brigman wrote: > I have a server running several applications. They typically have the > best support for mysql. > Is there a hard reason for postgresql-server over mysql for koji? It hasn't been a priority to support multiple dbs. Postgres was chosen because we placed a high value on data integrity. The tables in Koji use a lot of 'serial' fields (integer fields linked to a sequence). In MySQL, the analog of this is an AUTO_INCREMENT field. It does not appear that this is a perfect analog. In any case, there would have to be a number of code changes due to this. If one were to use MySQL, they would most definitely want to use InnoDB tables, because Koji makes use of many foreign key constraints. Almost every table in Koji's schema has a CHECK clause somewhere in it. MySQL parses these, but /does not enforce them/. The types of data corruption that would result from entries that violate these checks would be quite insidious. I also expect there would be a number of subtle issues due to other behavior differences between the databases. With MySQL's reputation for quietly rolling along despite serious errors, you might not notice until the db was full of corruptions. So short answer: non-trivial amount of work to implement, even more for proper testing, questionable return for that effort. Running a Koji server is not intended to be lightweight. I don't think the postgres requirement is unreasonable. From Greg.Trahair at tomtom.com Wed Aug 19 09:08:32 2009 From: Greg.Trahair at tomtom.com (Greg Trahair) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:08:32 +0200 Subject: Koji and Signing RPMS Message-ID: <795F7F7504280A4591BF7D83DC1896B40339864D@nl-exc-02.intra.local> Hi All, I'm using Koji in combination with Mash to create rpms, but at the moment I'm not signing them and I need to start that now. I'm finding it quite hard to find any way that the koji/mash combination can do this without me having to create my own mechanism. Is there anyone that can provide a procedure on how this can be achieved? [me at kojihub] ~ $ rpm -q koji mash koji-1.3.1-1.el5.1 mash-0.2.10-3.el5 Thanks in advance, Greg Trahair -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mikem at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 16:02:31 2009 From: mikem at redhat.com (Mike McLean) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:02:31 -0400 Subject: Koji and Signing RPMS In-Reply-To: <795F7F7504280A4591BF7D83DC1896B40339864D@nl-exc-02.intra.local> References: <795F7F7504280A4591BF7D83DC1896B40339864D@nl-exc-02.intra.local> Message-ID: <4A8C2217.5020008@redhat.com> On 08/19/2009 05:08 AM, Greg Trahair wrote: > I'm using Koji in combination with Mash to create rpms, but at the > moment I'm not signing them and I need to start that now. I'm finding > it quite hard to find any way that the koji/mash combination can do this > without me having to create my own mechanism. Koji does not have an internal signing mechanism. It tracks signatures and can store differently signed copies of the same rpm efficiently, but it does not create signatures. If you import a signed rpm, koji will import the signature. You can import signatures for an rpm later by using the import-sig subcommand. The basic tool for signing rpms is rpm itself. http://docs.fedoraproject.org/drafts/rpm-guide-en/ch11s04.html To sign an rpm from koji, you should make a copy of the file, sign it with the appropriate rpm command, and import the signature. Fedora rel-eng has a script to help automate this. Note that you should not simply sign the file directly under /mnt/koji, as this causes an inconsistency between the filesystem and the database (hence the copy step). https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/browser/scripts/sign_unsigned.py From jkeating at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 17:52:01 2009 From: jkeating at redhat.com (Jesse Keating) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:52:01 -0700 Subject: Koji and Signing RPMS In-Reply-To: <4A8C2217.5020008@redhat.com> References: <795F7F7504280A4591BF7D83DC1896B40339864D@nl-exc-02.intra.local> <4A8C2217.5020008@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1250704321.3107.28.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 12:02 -0400, Mike McLean wrote: > On 08/19/2009 05:08 AM, Greg Trahair wrote: > > I'm using Koji in combination with Mash to create rpms, but at the > > moment I'm not signing them and I need to start that now. I'm finding > > it quite hard to find any way that the koji/mash combination can do this > > without me having to create my own mechanism. > > Koji does not have an internal signing mechanism. It tracks signatures > and can store differently signed copies of the same rpm efficiently, but > it does not create signatures. > > If you import a signed rpm, koji will import the signature. You can > import signatures for an rpm later by using the import-sig subcommand. > > The basic tool for signing rpms is rpm itself. > http://docs.fedoraproject.org/drafts/rpm-guide-en/ch11s04.html > > To sign an rpm from koji, you should make a copy of the file, sign it > with the appropriate rpm command, and import the signature. Fedora > rel-eng has a script to help automate this. Note that you should not > simply sign the file directly under /mnt/koji, as this causes an > inconsistency between the filesystem and the database (hence the copy step). > > https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/browser/scripts/sign_unsigned.py A recent project was started to create a secure signing server for doing these types of operations: https://fedorahosted.org/sigul/ https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/browser/scripts/sigulsign_unsigned.py has been written to use the sigul setup. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom? is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From tan20bk at yahoo.com Thu Aug 20 02:07:02 2009 From: tan20bk at yahoo.com (NGUYEN VAN TAN) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:07:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: =?utf-8?q?V=E1=BB=81=3A_Fedora-buildsys-list_Digest=2C_Vol_54=2C?= =?utf-8?q?_Issue_5?= In-Reply-To: <20090817160007.409446195CD@hormel.redhat.com> Message-ID: <583856.97451.qm@web62402.mail.re1.yahoo.com> I tried to install follow the thread https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-buildsys-list/2009-July/msg00000.html. And I tried to init buildroot by command mock -r fedora-9-ppc --init? to check if mock can make a cross build environment first but it didn't run. It reported errors. mock -r fedora-9-ppc --init INFO: mock.py version 0.9.16 starting... State Changed: init plugins State Changed: start State Changed: lock buildroot State Changed: clean State Changed: init State Changed: lock buildroot Mock Version: 0.9.16 INFO: Mock Version: 0.9.16 INFO: enabled root cache INFO: enabled yum cache State Changed: cleaning yum metadata INFO: enabled ccache State Changed: running yum ERROR: Command failed: ?# /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-9-ppc/ root/? groupinstall buildsys-build redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch from fedora has depsolving problems ? --> Missing Dependency: perl(Getopt::Long) is needed by package redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch (fedora) redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch from fedora has depsolving problems ? --> Missing Dependency: /bin/sh is needed by package redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch (fedora) redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch from fedora has depsolving problems ? --> Missing Dependency: /bin/bash is needed by package redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch (fedora) fedora-release-notes-9.0.2-1.noarch from updates-released has depsolving problems ? --> Missing Dependency: /bin/sh is needed by package fedora-release-notes-9.0.2-1.noarch (updates-released) redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch from fedora has depsolving problems ? --> Missing Dependency: mktemp is needed by package redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch (fedora) fedora-release-notes-9.0.2-1.noarch from updates-released has depsolving problems ? --> Missing Dependency: /bin/sh is needed by package fedora-release-notes-9.0.2-1.noarch (updates-released) redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch from fedora has depsolving problems ? --> Missing Dependency: /usr/bin/perl is needed by package redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch (fedora) Error: Missing Dependency: /usr/bin/perl is needed by package redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch (fedora) Error: Missing Dependency: /bin/sh is needed by package fedora-release-notes-9.0.2-1.noarch (updates-released) Error: Missing Dependency: perl(Getopt::Long) is needed by package redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch (fedora) Error: Missing Dependency: /bin/sh is needed by package redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch (fedora) Error: Missing Dependency: /bin/bash is needed by package redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch (fedora) Error: Missing Dependency: mktemp is needed by package redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch (fedora) ?You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem ?You could try running: package-cleanup --problems ??????????????????????? package-cleanup --dupes ??????????????????????? rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest The program package-cleanup is found in the yum-utils package. I think mock-cross hasn't run yet. Do I have to configure any thing to make mock can cross build first. Thank in advance. Nguy?n V?n T?n --- Ng?y Th? 2, 17/08/09, fedora-buildsys-list-request at redhat.com ?? vi?t: T?: fedora-buildsys-list-request at redhat.com Ch? ??: Fedora-buildsys-list Digest, Vol 54, Issue 5 ??n: fedora-buildsys-list at redhat.com Ng?y: Th? Hai, 17 th?ng 8, 2009, 23:00 Send Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list submissions to ??? fedora-buildsys-list at redhat.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit ??? https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ??? fedora-buildsys-list-request at redhat.com You can reach the person managing the list at ??? fedora-buildsys-list-owner at redhat.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Fedora-buildsys-list digest..." Today's Topics: ???1. Using koji to build Fedora ppc on i386 (NGUYEN VAN TAN) ???2. Re: Using koji to build Fedora ppc on i386 (Jesse Keating) ???3. Re: Using koji to build Fedora ppc on i386 (Mike McLean) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:42:55 -0700 (PDT) From: NGUYEN VAN TAN Subject: Using koji to build Fedora ppc on i386 To: fedora-buildsys-list at redhat.com Message-ID: <235425.55444.qm at web62406.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi all, I'm wondering there is possible to build Fedora 9 PPC on an I386 Fedora 9 by using koji. If it is possible how to configure koji to do that. Thank you, ? ? ? "T?t h?n, tho?ng g?n h?n, nhanh h?n -Tr?i nghi?m Yahoo! Mail m?i h?m nay! http://vn.mail.yahoo.com" -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-buildsys-list/attachments/20090816/6fbf166e/attachment.html ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:52:45 -0700 From: Jesse Keating Subject: Re: Using koji to build Fedora ppc on i386 To: tannv84 at gmail.com,??? Discussion of Fedora build system ??? Message-ID: <1250520765.2745.53.camel at localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 23:42 -0700, NGUYEN VAN TAN wrote: > I'm wondering there is possible to build Fedora 9 PPC on an I386 Fedora 9 by using koji. > If it is possible how to configure koji to do that. Not easily possible.? You'd have to be running koji under qemu and make sure all launched process are under qemu, which will make it extremely slow. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom? is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-buildsys-list/attachments/20090817/6708795b/attachment.bin ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:53:30 -0400 From: Mike McLean Subject: Re: Using koji to build Fedora ppc on i386 To: tannv84 at gmail.com,??? Discussion of Fedora build system ??? Message-ID: ??? <4f50e0680908170753w6e9d029bi3ffcd84cd9be4b4b at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:42 AM, NGUYEN VAN TAN wrote: > I'm wondering there is possible to build Fedora 9 PPC on an I386 Fedora 9 by > using koji. > If it is possible how to configure koji to do that. At present koji does not support cross compilation, though there was a thread with some patches last month. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-buildsys-list/2009-July/msg00000.html ------------------------------ -- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list Fedora-buildsys-list at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list End of Fedora-buildsys-list Digest, Vol 54, Issue 5 *************************************************** Phong c?ch h?n v?i nhi?u m?u n?n m?i. H?y d?ng Yahoo! Messenger 9.0! http://vn.messenger.yahoo.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lijian.gnu at gmail.com Thu Aug 20 02:55:52 2009 From: lijian.gnu at gmail.com (=?GB2312?B?wO69qA==?=) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:55:52 +0800 Subject: =?utf-8?q?Re=3A_V=E1=BB=81=3A_Fedora-buildsys-list_Digest=2C_Vol?= =?utf-8?q?_54=2C_Issue_5?= In-Reply-To: <583856.97451.qm@web62402.mail.re1.yahoo.com> References: <20090817160007.409446195CD@hormel.redhat.com> <583856.97451.qm@web62402.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <426c385a0908191955h115eb115na7c5cb544121f6e1@mail.gmail.com> maybe you should check you build groups # koji list-groups 2009/8/20 NGUYEN VAN TAN > I tried to install follow the thread > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-buildsys-list/2009-July/msg00000.html > . > And I tried to init buildroot by command > mock -r fedora-9-ppc --init to check if mock can make a cross build > environment first but it didn't run. It reported errors. > mock -r fedora-9-ppc --init > INFO: mock.py version 0.9.16 starting... > State Changed: init plugins > State Changed: start > State Changed: lock buildroot > State Changed: clean > State Changed: init > State Changed: lock buildroot > Mock Version: 0.9.16 > INFO: Mock Version: 0.9.16 > INFO: enabled root cache > INFO: enabled yum cache > State Changed: cleaning yum metadata > INFO: enabled ccache > State Changed: running yum > ERROR: Command failed: > # /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-9-ppc/ root/ > groupinstall buildsys-build > redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch from fedora has depsolving problems > --> Missing Dependency: perl(Getopt::Long) is needed by package > redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch (fedora) > redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch from fedora has depsolving problems > --> Missing Dependency: /bin/sh is needed by package > redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch (fedora) > redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch from fedora has depsolving problems > --> Missing Dependency: /bin/bash is needed by package > redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch (fedora) > fedora-release-notes-9.0.2-1.noarch from updates-released has depsolving > problems > --> Missing Dependency: /bin/sh is needed by package > fedora-release-notes-9.0.2-1.noarch (updates-released) > redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch from fedora has depsolving problems > --> Missing Dependency: mktemp is needed by package > redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch (fedora) > fedora-release-notes-9.0.2-1.noarch from updates-released has depsolving > problems > --> Missing Dependency: /bin/sh is needed by package > fedora-release-notes-9.0.2-1.noarch (updates-released) > redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch from fedora has depsolving problems > --> Missing Dependency: /usr/bin/perl is needed by package > redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch (fedora) > Error: Missing Dependency: /usr/bin/perl is needed by package > redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch (fedora) > Error: Missing Dependency: /bin/sh is needed by package > fedora-release-notes-9.0.2-1.noarch (updates-released) > Error: Missing Dependency: perl(Getopt::Long) is needed by package > redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch (fedora) > Error: Missing Dependency: /bin/sh is needed by package > redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch (fedora) > Error: Missing Dependency: /bin/bash is needed by package > redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch (fedora) > Error: Missing Dependency: mktemp is needed by package > redhat-rpm-config-9.0.2-1.fc9.noarch (fedora) > You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem > You could try running: package-cleanup --problems > package-cleanup --dupes > rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest > The program package-cleanup is found in the yum-utils package. > > I think mock-cross hasn't run yet. Do I have to configure any thing to make > mock can cross build first. > > Thank in advance. > > > Nguy?n V?n T?n > > --- Ng?y *Th? 2, 17/08/09, fedora-buildsys-list-request at redhat.com < > fedora-buildsys-list-request at redhat.com>* ?? vi?t: > > > T?: fedora-buildsys-list-request at redhat.com < > fedora-buildsys-list-request at redhat.com> > Ch? ??: Fedora-buildsys-list Digest, Vol 54, Issue 5 > ??n: fedora-buildsys-list at redhat.com > Ng?y: Th? Hai, 17 th?ng 8, 2009, 23:00 > > Send Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list submissions to > fedora-buildsys-list at redhat.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > fedora-buildsys-list-request at redhat.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > fedora-buildsys-list-owner at redhat.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Fedora-buildsys-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Using koji to build Fedora ppc on i386 (NGUYEN VAN TAN) > 2. Re: Using koji to build Fedora ppc on i386 (Jesse Keating) > 3. Re: Using koji to build Fedora ppc on i386 (Mike McLean) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:42:55 -0700 (PDT) > From: NGUYEN VAN TAN > > > Subject: Using koji to build Fedora ppc on i386 > To: fedora-buildsys-list at redhat.com > Message-ID: <235425.55444.qm at web62406.mail.re1.yahoo.com > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hi all, > > I'm wondering there is possible to build Fedora 9 PPC on an I386 Fedora 9 > by using koji. > If it is possible how to configure koji to do that. > > Thank you, > > > > > > > "T?t h?n, tho?ng g?n h?n, nhanh h?n -Tr?i nghi?m Yahoo! Mail m?i > h?m nay! > http://vn.mail.yahoo.com" > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-buildsys-list/attachments/20090816/6fbf166e/attachment.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:52:45 -0700 > From: Jesse Keating > > > Subject: Re: Using koji to build Fedora ppc on i386 > To: tannv84 at gmail.com , > Discussion of Fedora build system > > > > Message-ID: <1250520765.2745.53.camel at localhost.localdomain > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 23:42 -0700, NGUYEN VAN TAN wrote: > > I'm wondering there is possible to build Fedora 9 PPC on an I386 Fedora 9 > by using koji. > > If it is possible how to configure koji to do that. > > Not easily possible. You'd have to be running koji under qemu and make > sure all launched process are under qemu, which will make it extremely > slow. > > > -- > Jesse Keating > Fedora -- Freedom? is a feature! > identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 197 bytes > Desc: This is a digitally signed message part > Url : > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-buildsys-list/attachments/20090817/6708795b/attachment.bin > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:53:30 -0400 > From: Mike McLean > > > Subject: Re: Using koji to build Fedora ppc on i386 > To: tannv84 at gmail.com , > Discussion of Fedora build system > > > > Message-ID: > <4f50e0680908170753w6e9d029bi3ffcd84cd9be4b4b at mail.gmail.com > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:42 AM, NGUYEN VAN TAN> > wrote: > > I'm wondering there is possible to build Fedora 9 PPC on an I386 Fedora 9 > by > > using koji. > > If it is possible how to configure koji to do that. > > At present koji does not support cross compilation, though there was a > thread with some patches last month. > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-buildsys-list/2009-July/msg00000.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > -- > Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list > Fedora-buildsys-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list > > End of Fedora-buildsys-list Digest, Vol 54, Issue 5 > *************************************************** > > > ------------------------------ > C?m gi?c an to?n h?n khi online. > N?ng c?p l?n Internet Explorer 8 m?i, an to?n h?n,t?i ?u h?a cho Yahoo!. Ho?n to?n mi?n ph?. T?i > IE8 t?i ??y! > > -- > Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list > Fedora-buildsys-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list > -- ?? ?? http://jianlee.ylinux.org msn lijian.gnu at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Greg.Trahair at tomtom.com Thu Aug 20 07:16:03 2009 From: Greg.Trahair at tomtom.com (Greg Trahair) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:16:03 +0200 Subject: Koji and Signing RPMS References: <795F7F7504280A4591BF7D83DC1896B40339864D@nl-exc-02.intra.local> <4A8C2217.5020008@redhat.com> Message-ID: <795F7F7504280A4591BF7D83DC1896B4033989F6@nl-exc-02.intra.local> > To sign an rpm from koji, you should make a copy of the file, sign it > with the appropriate rpm command, and import the signature. Fedora > rel-eng has a script to help automate this. Note that you should not > simply sign the file directly under /mnt/koji, as this causes an > inconsistency between the filesystem and the database (hence the copy > step). > > https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/browser/scripts/sign_unsigned.py How do I use this sign_unsigned.py script? From lixiao-a at 163.com Tue Aug 25 08:58:55 2009 From: lixiao-a at 163.com (lixiao-a) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:58:55 +0800 (CST) Subject: Fedora-buildsys-list Digest, Vol 54, Issue 8 In-Reply-To: <20090820071804.D3EBF61A0CD@hormel.redhat.com> References: <20090820071804.D3EBF61A0CD@hormel.redhat.com> Message-ID: <24001658.274481251190735438.JavaMail.coremail@bj163app136.163.com> I added some srpms to it and saw its information on kojiweb. But it seems I can not build the srpms by koji (when I submit a build task to koji, it will "open" for a while, then it would finally come to be failed). I doubted if I have missed some configurations which connecting koji and mock. I have checked /var/log/kojid.log.it said [WARNING] koji.build.TaskManager: FAULT: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/kojid", line 1275, in runTask response = (handler.run(),) File "/usr/sbin/kojid", line 1351, in run return self.handler(*self.params,**self.opts) File "/usr/sbin/kojid", line 2517, in handler results = self.wait(subtasks.values(), all=True, failany=True) File "/usr/sbin/kojid", line 1428, in wait raise task_error Fault: From lixiao-a at 163.com Wed Aug 26 02:02:38 2009 From: lixiao-a at 163.com (lixiao-a) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:02:38 +0800 (CST) Subject: How can I waite for a new dist-foo-build repo In-Reply-To: <20090825160013.6A411619E0E@hormel.redhat.com> References: <20090825160013.6A411619E0E@hormel.redhat.com> Message-ID: <15217197.459491251252158655.JavaMail.coremail@bj163app136.163.com> When I build a srpm,it can not waite genarate a new repo,it says. 1076 build (dist-foo, system-config-network-1.3.99-1.src.rpm): free 1076 build (dist-foo, system-config-network-1.3.99-1.src.rpm): free -> open (kojibuilder) 1077 waitrepo (3): free 1077 waitrepo (3): free -> open (kojibuilder) 1077 waitrepo (3): open (kojibuilder) -> FAILED: GenericError: Unsuccessfully waited 120:58 for a new dist-foo-build repo 0 free 1 open 0 done 1 failed 1076 build (dist-foo, system-config-network-1.3.99-1.src.rpm): open (kojibuilder) -> FAILED: GenericError: Unsuccessfully waited 120:58 for a new dist-foo-build repo 0 free 0 open 0 done 2 failed 1076 build (dist-foo, system-config-network-1.3.99-1.src.rpm) failed the /var/log/kojid.log shows Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/kojid", line 1275, in runTask response = (handler.run(),) File "/usr/sbin/kojid", line 1351, in run return self.handler(*self.params,**self.opts) File "/usr/sbin/kojid", line 2517, in handler results = self.wait(subtasks.values(), all=True, failany=True) File "/usr/sbin/kojid", line 1428, in wait raise task_error Fault: From jiteshs at marvell.com Wed Aug 26 03:46:28 2009 From: jiteshs at marvell.com (Jitesh Shah) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:46:28 -0700 Subject: How can I waite for a new dist-foo-build repo In-Reply-To: <15217197.459491251252158655.JavaMail.coremail@bj163app136.163.com> References: <20090825160013.6A411619E0E@hormel.redhat.com>, <15217197.459491251252158655.JavaMail.coremail@bj163app136.163.com> Message-ID: <91A41E78C4F4444BBD1EB4198A7B9C4F5DD5DB5E2F@SC-VEXCH2.marvell.com> Looks like either you don't have kojira running or there is no builder in the createrepo channel Refer: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Koji/ServerHowTo Regards, Jitesh ________________________________________ From: fedora-buildsys-list-bounces at redhat.com [fedora-buildsys-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of lixiao-a [lixiao-a at 163.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 7:32 AM To: fedora-buildsys-list Subject: How can I waite for a new dist-foo-build repo When I build a srpm,it can not waite genarate a new repo,it says. 1076 build (dist-foo, system-config-network-1.3.99-1.src.rpm): free 1076 build (dist-foo, system-config-network-1.3.99-1.src.rpm): free -> open (kojibuilder) 1077 waitrepo (3): free 1077 waitrepo (3): free -> open (kojibuilder) 1077 waitrepo (3): open (kojibuilder) -> FAILED: GenericError: Unsuccessfully waited 120:58 for a new dist-foo-build repo 0 free 1 open 0 done 1 failed 1076 build (dist-foo, system-config-network-1.3.99-1.src.rpm): open (kojibuilder) -> FAILED: GenericError: Unsuccessfully waited 120:58 for a new dist-foo-build repo 0 free 0 open 0 done 2 failed 1076 build (dist-foo, system-config-network-1.3.99-1.src.rpm) failed the /var/log/kojid.log shows Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/kojid", line 1275, in runTask response = (handler.run(),) File "/usr/sbin/kojid", line 1351, in run return self.handler(*self.params,**self.opts) File "/usr/sbin/kojid", line 2517, in handler results = self.wait(subtasks.values(), all=True, failany=True) File "/usr/sbin/kojid", line 1428, in wait raise task_error Fault: From mikem at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 16:36:13 2009 From: mikem at redhat.com (Mike McLean) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:36:13 -0400 Subject: How can I waite for a new dist-foo-build repo In-Reply-To: <15217197.459491251252158655.JavaMail.coremail@bj163app136.163.com> References: <20090825160013.6A411619E0E@hormel.redhat.com> <15217197.459491251252158655.JavaMail.coremail@bj163app136.163.com> Message-ID: <4A95647D.9040001@redhat.com> On 08/25/2009 10:02 PM, lixiao-a wrote: > When I build a srpm,it can not waite genarate a new repo,it says. > 1076 build (dist-foo, system-config-network-1.3.99-1.src.rpm): free > 1076 build (dist-foo, system-config-network-1.3.99-1.src.rpm): free -> open (kojibuilder) > 1077 waitrepo (3): free > 1077 waitrepo (3): free -> open (kojibuilder) > 1077 waitrepo (3): open (kojibuilder) -> FAILED: GenericError: Unsuccessfully waited 120:58 for a new dist-foo-build repo As the error reports, the build already waited 2 hours for a repo and didn't find one, so it is not a matter of waiting. The system is not creating them. The most likely reasons for this are (as Jitesh wrote): 1) kojira not running 2) no hosts in the createrepo channel It is also possible that 3) createrepo jobs are failing If it is 1 or 2, that is an easy fix. Note that hosts in the createrepo channel need write access to /mnt/koji in order to succeed. If it is 3, you should look for failed createrepo tasks and see what the logs say. From mikem at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 20:48:28 2009 From: mikem at redhat.com (Mike McLean) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:48:28 -0400 Subject: How can I waite for a new dist-foo-build repo In-Reply-To: <4A95647D.9040001@redhat.com> References: <20090825160013.6A411619E0E@hormel.redhat.com> <15217197.459491251252158655.JavaMail.coremail@bj163app136.163.com> <4A95647D.9040001@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4A959F9C.5020006@redhat.com> On 08/26/2009 12:36 PM, Mike McLean wrote: ... > The most likely reasons for this are (as Jitesh wrote): > 1) kojira not running > 2) no hosts in the createrepo channel > It is also possible that > 3) createrepo jobs are failing > > If it is 1 or 2, that is an easy fix. Note that hosts in the createrepo > channel need write access to /mnt/koji in order to succeed. Correction: they only need read access. > If it is 3, you should look for failed createrepo tasks and see what the > logs say.