How to handel spinning when i686 versions of packages don't make it into the updates repo?
William F. Acker WB2FLW +1 303 722 7209
wacker at octothorp.org
Fri Jan 1 00:12:48 UTC 2010
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 00:05 -0700, William F. Acker WB2FLW +1 303 722
> 7209 wrote:
>
>> I've always noticed that when a package is updated, sometimes the
>> i686 version isn't put into the x86_64 repo for updates.
>
> Can you clarify what you're asking here? It sounds like you're saying
> you expect the x86_64 repo to contain i686 packages?
>
Um, -- well- -- yes. It always does. My concern is that when
packages are updated, and there is an i686 and x86_64 version in the
original release tree, the updates tree only has the x86_64 version, which
is why I ask the question of how to handle it. I could make sure that
only the x86_64 version of the package appears on the release I'm
spinning, or should I make sure that the updated i686 package is carried
to my release if it was present in the original release by Fedora. I hope
this clarifies my concern.
--
Bill in Denver
More information about the Fedora-buildsys-list
mailing list