How to handel spinning when i686 versions of packages don't make it into the updates repo?

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Mon Jan 4 16:32:36 UTC 2010


On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 11:11 -0500, Mike McLean wrote:
> On 12/30/2009 02:05 AM, William F. Acker WB2FLW +1 303 722 7209 wrote:
> > I've always noticed that when a package is updated, sometimes the i686
> > version isn't put into the x86_64 repo for updates. As a workaround, I
> 
> Can you give some examples? If multilib content is inconsistent across 
> updates then we really ought to sort that out.
> 

Multilib set is dynamically determined each compose.  If the package
itself changes in a way that no longer triggers the multilib algorithm,
then it will fall out of being multilib. 

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-buildsys-list/attachments/20100104/af80fd6f/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list