replacing XMMS

[Colin Walters]

On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 14:18, Brian Pepple wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 13:48, Colin Walters wrote:
> 
> > What I'm curious of is comments by people who still use XMMS, and why. 
> > What are the most important things to you that need to be fixed in
> > Rhythmbox?
> 
> I still use XMMS, since it's less CPU intensive than Rhythmbox.  On an
> older machine Rhythmbox, tends to use too much resources.

True.  There's a few senses of "removal" - removal from the package set
entirely, and just removal from the default installation, and removal
from the default menu.  I'm really only talking about the latter.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-desktop-list/attachments/20040421/3427306e/attachment.sig>