[Usability] : First report of the Fedora Usability Sig

[Damien Durand]

Yeah, but if we make this, we should move all pages related to usability and
by consequent, moved all pages of other sig

I'm not agree with you, for me the actuel location is not a problem.

Regars,

Damien

2006/8/27, Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>:
>
> On Sun, 2006-08-27 at 17:05 +0200, Damien Durand wrote:
> > The Usability Sig is not a Fedora Extras sig. The location is correct.
>
> I disagree.  It should be under
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Usability instead of under
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Usability, which gives the impression that
> it is an approved project, instead of a SIG.
>
> /B
> --
> Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>
>
> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
> BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
>
>
> --
> Fedora-desktop-list mailing list
> Fedora-desktop-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-desktop-list/attachments/20060827/e7c78ec2/attachment.htm>