[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: directions in Fedora desktop project



Thilo Pfennig wrote:
Rahul Sundaram schrieb:
Thilo Pfennig wrote:
Rahul Sundaram schrieb:
No. Its not. Everyone was open to join the fedora summit channel and
send feedback. Fedora devel list is also open to everyone.
But the wiki is not. And as summit is over no irc contributions. I know
that I may post emails to most fedora lists, but thats not much. I can
also do this on every open mailing lists for any proprietary software.
Summit had a IRC channel. #fedora-summit as I have already pointed out
in a previous message. What more do you need?
Direct access to the wiki with different license and without the need to
sign a CLA. So my options really are:

 * Build a community version of Fedora or
 * Just leave the project.

We are very unlikely to drop the CLA. It is a well recognized process that is used by several community projects with clear benefits. A quick sample:

http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/20050325novalis.html
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/assigning.html
http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/faq-licensing.html#jca1
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/sun_contributor_agreement/

Rahul


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]