Pilgrim, kadischi, and stateless (was Re: [Fedora-livecd-list] pilgrim livecd work)
David Zeuthen
davidz at redhat.com
Fri Sep 22 01:39:13 UTC 2006
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 21:26 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> David Zeuthen (davidz at redhat.com) said:
> > Right. My understanding is that the controversial part of unionfs is the
> > ability to join multiple writable file systems into a single tree. Is
> > this correct?
Just found the page here,
http://www.am-utils.org/project-unionfs.html
And yes, it appears it's designed to do a lot of things instead of just
doing one thing really well.
> Well, in my experience, all I tried was one readable + one writable, and
> *that* blew up. So, my objection was that the basic case failed.
I'm more curious how hard it can be given the assumptions I listed in my
other mail. Then again, I'm not a kernel hacker and got too much on my
plate already :-)
David
More information about the Fedora-desktop-list
mailing list