[Fedora-livecd-list] pilgrim livecd work

[seth vidal]

On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 00:31 +0200, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> On 9/20/06, David Zeuthen <davidz at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Sure, I'm all for that and am hopeful to get contributors besides
> > myself. Would have to review patches etc. on list since other projects
> > such as OLPC depends on pilgrim. But that's no different from other open
> > source projects.
> 
> After reading all these mails :), i'll tend to say that pilgrim's yum
> approach sounds great. Yum's new metaparser might play a great role as
> well. However, anaconda provides kickstart file feature to kadischi
> and this is greatly used by people in the fedora-livecd list.
> 
> Sure, I'm not saying that kadischi has to adapt itself to pilgrim's
> theory. But since, kadischi is only maintained for the moment by
> Jasper and I at a very slow rate, it would be best to consider on what
> 
> * what is Kadischi, by the Fedora Project
> * which one should be a Fedora Live image Creator/Installer
> * how both pilgrim and kadischi can benefit.
> 

implementing a %packages in ks.cfg-style parser as a yum-util shouldn't
be much work. Mostly just extracting the code from anaconda, I'd bet.

-sv