Plans for the desktop beyond Fedora 7

[Jesse Keating]

On Saturday 12 May 2007 12:00:44 Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> So the obvious question would be; Are we going to move toward
> NetworkManager?
>
> I agree that having multiple config stacks is bad, but the problem here
> is choice (where did I hear that before?). As long as we're not forcing
> the user / system admin to choose between s-c-n/NM, and/or service
> network vs. NM, you'll have multiple config stacks. The problem may not
> be solved by enabling upstream NM to take over s-c-n functionality and
> stability and just force the use of NM over s-c-n, rather then just
> letting (forcing) someone choose between the two configuration systems,
> right?

I personally don't have an answer for this.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-desktop-list/attachments/20070514/c7eea657/attachment.sig>