install pam_keyring by default in the GNOME based live cd?

[David Zeuthen]

Hi Jon,

I'm replying to an old thread; see below. Is there any chance we can get
pam-keyring in by default for Fedora 8? If yes, how about creating a
Wiki page for the feature much like the ones Matthias created for other
F8 bound features as mentioned here

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-desktop-list/2007-May/msg00167.html

so we can track the progress and everyone can get an overview of what
work is required etc. Thanks!

     David

On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 10:01 +0100, Jon Nettleton wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 08:12 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Dan Williams wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 04:36 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > >> Hi
> > >>
> > >> "PAM_KEYRING is a pam module that launches the
> gnome-keyring-daemon and 
> > >> then unlocks a keyring using your login password."
> > >>
> > >>
> http://www.hekanetworks.com/index.php/publisher/articleview/frmArticleID/25/staticId/31/
> > > 
> > > +1
> > 
> > We have two bugs open against pam_keyring now both of which are
> very 
> > important to fix if we need to put this in by default. CC'ing the 
> > current upstream and Fedora maintainer
> > 
> > * Should have an automated way to enable - 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232857
> > * Make it possible to change keyring password - 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212845
> > 
> > The first bug probably can fixed by adding rpm post installation 
> > scripts. The second bug currently requiring patching gnome-keyring.
> 
> Well you guys caught me at a good time.  I am on vacation this week and
> one of the things I had planned was to finally push the next version of
> pam_keyring.  This version will have password changing support in it and
> should close bug #212845.
> 
> I also started working on mockups of system-config-authentication that
> include a tab that would detect if you had pam_keyring or pam_ssh was
> available and add check boxes to enable it at graphical login.  Maybe I
> will spend and hour or two and finish that up.  Does that sound like a
> good solution for bug #232857?
> 
> Jon
>