no epiphany.i386 package for Fedora x86_64 ?

[Kevin Verma]

dragoran wrote:
> Kevin Verma wrote:
>> dragoran wrote:
>>> Anuj Verma (Kevin) wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:22:10 -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>> Fedora doesn't have a 32 bit package for compatibility; it's only 
>>>>> there
>>>>> because of the way multilib works.  If so many apps didn't rely on 
>>>>> it to
>>>>> build against, there would be only a 64 bit version.
>>>>>     
>>>>
>>>> but there is a firefox.i386
>>>>   
>>> yes because packages needs it to build against it. (every package 
>>> that has a -devel package has a i386 and a x86_64 version)
>>>>> Now that nspluginwrapper is in rawhide though, it should be working 
>>>>> no?
>>>>>   File a bug if not.
>>>>>     
>>>>
>>>> yes i noticed that "nspluginwrapper" is there but it is not working 
>>>> right for sure. I hope to bug report it soon.
>>>>   
>>> works fine here also we have a 64bit java plugin in rawhide (I am 
>>> using blackdown java on my x86_64 f7 box)
>>>
>> I tried both IcedTea and Black down 64bit plugin those work, but the 
>> flash-plugin is not working at all under nspluginwrapper
>>
> working fine here... no crashes or anything does not notice anything 
> different then without nspluginwrapper...
> is it listed under about:plugins ?
> 
Hello,

Thanks for offering your help, I was too nick of time to test this issue 
previously. All the time in about:plugins flash plugin was listed as 
unknown plugin "do not open"

However with today's nspluginwrapper & firefox updates, I looked into 
this issue further and I found that perhaps an old stale file 
"npwrapper.libflashplayer.so" was causing the issue, I simply removed 
the same and re-installed flash-plugin & nspluginwrapper packages with yum.

Not really running after major bugs this season, lot too many folks have 
their eyes on it :-)

Cheers,
Kevin