[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: making the i386 livecd fit
- From: Matthias Clasen <mclasen redhat com>
- To: Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop <fedora-desktop-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: making the i386 livecd fit
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:07:15 -0500
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 11:59 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Matthias Clasen (mclasen redhat com) said:
> > > > - don't include groups where upstream gnome is < 50% translated
> > > > - don't include fonts that are only referenced in %fonts and those groups
> > > > - remove ekiga, just because it drags in so much other stuff
> > > >
> > > > Comments?
> >
> > In the past, any attempts to go to a subset of language have always met
> > with strong resistance. Just kicking out some fonts/input methods, but
> > leaving the "unsupported" translations in the packages may send a
> > somewhat mixed message, but is probably the only thing we can do since
> > noone knows how to make %_install_langs work.
>
> Yeah, I'm just wondering if it's worth it installing fonts for a
> language that's only 10% translated in the desktop (for example.)
>
> > Anyway, if we go with this approach, there should be at least a comment
> > in the kickstart file explaining how the excluded font groups have been
> > determined.
>
> The alternative is to still kick out ekiga (sorry, it's pretty large),
> and find the rest of the space somewhere else.
>
Kicking the debuginfo out of mono-core should give us on the order of
15M, I think:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430500
But I am not opposed to do the font pruning. All I'm asking is that you
add a comment explaining the rationale and where the data came from.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]