[fedora-java] Automated Eclipse tests

Bryce McKinlay mckinlay at redhat.com
Tue Mar 8 15:50:41 UTC 2005


Andrew Overholt wrote:

>CCing Bryce McKinlay
>
>* Dimitrie O. Paun <dpaun at rogers.com> [2005-03-07 22:16]:
>  
>
>>On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 03:20:38PM -0700, Aaron Luchko wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>I've been pitting them up against the IBM and BEA jvms we have for the
>>>stuff we ship with RHEL-3, the last time I successfully ran them was
>>>with the last 3.0 we had, it didn't fare too badly other than debugging
>>>(no JDWP) though our stuff has changed quite a bit since then.
>>>      
>>>
>>"didn't fare too badly" = faster, slower, about the same? Any hard numbers?
>>    
>>
>
>I don't have any hard numbers, but things feel about the same or faster
>than with a proprietary JVM.  The thing to remember is that we have no gcj
>optimizations turned on at this point.  I know Bryce was working on it ...
>Bryce, do you have a status of that?
>

My last eclipse -O2 attempt was a few weeks ago, and some fixes have 
gone in to GCJ since then. At this point it should be possible to 
compile most of the .jar's with -O2, but there are likely to still be 
optimization bugs that cause eclipse to misbehave or crash when it is 
built with -O2. Is resources.jar still used entirely uncompiled? We 
should perhaps concentrate on that bug first.

Startup time is also an issue - we should be able to beat the JVM easily 
here but currently we arn't. It would be worth profiling the startup 
sequence to see if any obvious bottlenecks can be identified.

Bryce




More information about the fedora-devel-java-list mailing list