[fedora-java] Using the natively-built Eclipse compiler
Thomas Fitzsimmons
fitzsim at redhat.com
Wed Mar 9 21:32:11 UTC 2005
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 22:24 +0100, Ziga Mahkovec wrote:
>On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 11:38 -0500, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
>> On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 15:04 +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> >I see. Of course, I have no idea why tools.jar is attempting to use
>> >the gcjlib:// class loader, or why it is so slow when it does. It
>> >really should not explicitly use this class loader.
>>
>> I doesn't any more. We were doing that to avoid having to always add
>> jdtcore.jar to the classpath. I also have no idea why it's so slow but
>> I did notice a significant performance hit when compared to interpreted
>> mode.
>>
>> Ziga, you can get the sources for java-gcj-compat from
>> sources.redhat.com:
>
>Ah, much better, thanks. Here are the revised times (BTW, that's a
>1.5GHz Pentium M):
>
>HelloWorld
>
>ecj | ecj-native | jikes
>-------------------------------------------------------------
>real 0m1.863s | real 0m1.614s | real 0m0.067s
>user 0m1.758s | user 0m1.536s | user 0m0.050s
>sys 0m0.103s | sys 0m0.076s | sys 0m0.012s
>
>
>GNU Classpath (cd lib; make)
>
>ecj | ecj-native | jikes
>-------------------------------------------------------------
>real 1m24.539s | real 0m24.552s | real 0m9.439s
>user 1m23.157s | user 0m23.047s | user 0m7.486s
>sys 0m1.142s | sys 0m1.139s | sys 0m0.771s
>
>
What release of eclipse-ecj are you using? Just recently we were able
to build Eclipse with -O2 on x86. I'm not sure if the new packages have
hit rawhide yet.
Tom
More information about the fedora-devel-java-list
mailing list