[fedora-java] [Patch] Improving gcj-dbtool performance

Bryce McKinlay mckinlay at redhat.com
Fri Mar 11 21:24:02 UTC 2005


Andrew Haley wrote:

>It should be just fine.  Try it.
>
>When used as I describe, almost all of the time is spent reading the
>jar files, not creating the maps.  There's nothing you can do about
>the maps that will make the process any faster. 
>  
>
We can have gcj generate the signature for each bytecode class and put 
it into class metadata at compilation time. That way gcj-dbtool won't 
need the .jar's.

Bryce




More information about the fedora-devel-java-list mailing list