[fedora-java] [Patch] Improving gcj-dbtool performance
Bryce McKinlay
mckinlay at redhat.com
Fri Mar 11 21:24:02 UTC 2005
Andrew Haley wrote:
>It should be just fine. Try it.
>
>When used as I describe, almost all of the time is spent reading the
>jar files, not creating the maps. There's nothing you can do about
>the maps that will make the process any faster.
>
>
We can have gcj generate the signature for each bytecode class and put
it into class metadata at compilation time. That way gcj-dbtool won't
need the .jar's.
Bryce
More information about the fedora-devel-java-list
mailing list