[fedora-java] mod_jk
Nicolas Mailhot
Nicolas.Mailhot at laPoste.net
Thu Mar 17 07:00:07 UTC 2005
Le mercredi 16 mars 2005 à 21:43 -0800, Kenneth Porter a écrit :
> --On Wednesday, March 16, 2005 8:34 PM -0800 Anthony Green
> <green at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > I just noticed that we don't build jk (from tomcat5) or package mod_jk
> > (or should that be jk2/mod_jk2?). It seems weird to package tomcat5,
> > but not the Apache httpd connector. Is it too late to squeeze into FC4?
>
> FC2 included mod_jk2, which is now deprecated.
But jk1 should be fine - it survived several rewrite attempts, the
latest being jk2.
jk1 is still actively developed and maintained, with regular releases.
Never understood why FC went for jk2 myself.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/attachments/20050317/bd8b3726/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-java-list
mailing list