Fedora docs processing (Was: [fedora-java] batik [Fwd: Re: com.sun.image.*])

Anthony Green green at redhat.com
Sat Oct 22 19:09:13 UTC 2005


On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 19:26 -0700, Anthony Green wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 16:28 -0700, Anthony Green wrote:
> > So, the next option is to look at using FOP without Batik.  If this is
> > even possible I suppose this means no SVG processing in FOP. 
> 
> This isn't possible.  Batik is fundamental to getting fop to work.
> 
> We're stuck until somebody tackles Batik.

Ok, so I tackled Batik and have an SRPM that builds now.  This basically
boiled down to removing JPEG and TIFF image handling, but - in theory -
PNG support should work.  The changes weren't nearly as bad as I first
thought.  Other than removing classes from the build, I only had to add
two patches.

But now we're stuck on GNU Classpath/libgcj not implementing some core
AWT functionality in java.awt.BasicStroke.

There was already a bug filed for this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22938

gnu.java.awt.peer.gtk.GdkTextLayout.getCharacterLevel(int) is also a
problem.

Hopefully somebody (fitzsim?) can comment on the status of these
classes.

This goal of rendering Fedora docs on a free stack is beginning to look
like an FC6 goal.

AG





More information about the fedora-devel-java-list mailing list