[fedora-java] Re: Fedora Core 5 Wishlist
Andrew Haley
aph at redhat.com
Fri Sep 16 10:05:34 UTC 2005
David Walluck writes:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Gary Benson wrote:
> > Couldn't have said it better myself. The only reason people are
> > starting to get strange mixes of packages is that Fedora has lagged
> > JPackage because there's not presently the manpower to keep them
> > level.
>
> There's no guarantee of this and, in fact, it is quite likely that
> jpackage versions will supercede FC4 versions (except there isn't
> much jpackage manpower right now, either). That is, unless you were
> to bump the epoch on every FC4 package as was done with eclipse
> (why the special case here I am not sure).
>
> On the other hand, people want more compatibility. And I want less
> (ideally no) duplication. So I would again ask for some policy that
> separates native libs from the jars. Or at least maybe someone is
> willing to put some real thought into it rather than dismissing it
> outright.
No-one is doing that. A great deal of real thought has been put into
this issue, and will continue to be.
Andrew.
More information about the fedora-devel-java-list
mailing list