[fedora-java] FC6 gcj notes
Thomas Fitzsimmons
fitzsim at redhat.com
Tue Jul 11 14:11:51 UTC 2006
Anthony Green wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 09:53 -0400, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
>> That said, everything is stalled on the libgcj-bc.so work right
>> now. If that isn't done in time we'll be stuck with GCJ 4.1 stock in
>> FC6.
>
> Ouch. Is libgcj-bc.so is supposed to be library that
> -findirect-dispatch binaries link against? What is the advantage of
> introducing this?
libgcj-bc.so's SONAME (libgcj-bc.so.1) stays constant, meaning that BC libraries
do not need to be relinked when libgcj.so's version changes.
Tom
More information about the fedora-devel-java-list
mailing list