From alcapcom at gmail.com Thu Aug 2 21:23:56 2007 From: alcapcom at gmail.com (Alphonse Van Assche) Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:23:56 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] problem to build eclipse plugin on ppc64 in rawhide Message-ID: <46B24B6C.6030701@gmail.com> Hi, I have just try to build my first package using koji, yeah :-) Like expect ;-) the package don't will build in rawhide on the ppc64 arch because of a segmentation fault, the same package build like a charm on F-7 so is there some problem in rawhide to build eclipse plugins at this time? You can take a look on the mock build.log file there -> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=86511&name=build.log Thanks, Alphonse From bkonrath at redhat.com Thu Aug 2 21:38:12 2007 From: bkonrath at redhat.com (Ben Konrath) Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:38:12 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] problem to build eclipse plugin on ppc64 in rawhide In-Reply-To: <46B24B6C.6030701@gmail.com> References: <46B24B6C.6030701@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1186090692.6924.2.camel@toast.toronto.redhat.com> On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 23:23 +0200, Alphonse Van Assche wrote: > Hi, > > I have just try to build my first package using koji, yeah :-) > Like expect ;-) the package don't will build in rawhide on the ppc64 > arch because of a segmentation fault, the same package build like a > charm on F-7 so is there some problem in rawhide to build eclipse > plugins at this time? > > You can take a look on the mock build.log file there -> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=86511&name=build.log You should try replacing this line: eclipse \ -nosplash \ with this line: java -cp $SDK/startup.jar \ -Dosgi.sharedConfiguration.area={_libdir}/eclipse/configuration \ org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main \ Cheers, Ben From alcapcom at gmail.com Thu Aug 2 22:37:01 2007 From: alcapcom at gmail.com (Alphonse Van Assche) Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 00:37:01 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] problem to build eclipse plugin on ppc64 in rawhide In-Reply-To: <1186090692.6924.2.camel@toast.toronto.redhat.com> References: <46B24B6C.6030701@gmail.com> <1186090692.6924.2.camel@toast.toronto.redhat.com> Message-ID: <46B25C8D.20800@gmail.com> Ben Konrath a ?crit : > On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 23:23 +0200, Alphonse Van Assche wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have just try to build my first package using koji, yeah :-) >> Like expect ;-) the package don't will build in rawhide on the ppc64 >> arch because of a segmentation fault, the same package build like a >> charm on F-7 so is there some problem in rawhide to build eclipse >> plugins at this time? >> >> You can take a look on the mock build.log file there -> >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=86511&name=build.log > > You should try replacing this line: > > eclipse \ > -nosplash \ > > with this line: > > java -cp $SDK/startup.jar \ > -Dosgi.sharedConfiguration.area={_libdir}/eclipse/configuration \ > org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main \ > > Thanks Ben that work! :), there was just a little syntax error in the above %_libdir macro (maybe that can be useful for others). - -Dosgi.sharedConfiguration.area={_libdir}/eclipse/configuration \ + -Dosgi.sharedConfiguration.area=%{_libdir}/eclipse/configuration \ From bkonrath at redhat.com Fri Aug 3 04:36:20 2007 From: bkonrath at redhat.com (Ben Konrath) Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 00:36:20 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] problem to build eclipse plugin on ppc64 in rawhide In-Reply-To: <46B25C8D.20800@gmail.com> References: <46B24B6C.6030701@gmail.com> <1186090692.6924.2.camel@toast.toronto.redhat.com> <46B25C8D.20800@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1186115780.30551.0.camel@plug> On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 00:37 +0200, Alphonse Van Assche wrote: > Ben Konrath a ?crit : > > On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 23:23 +0200, Alphonse Van Assche wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have just try to build my first package using koji, yeah :-) > >> Like expect ;-) the package don't will build in rawhide on the ppc64 > >> arch because of a segmentation fault, the same package build like a > >> charm on F-7 so is there some problem in rawhide to build eclipse > >> plugins at this time? > >> > >> You can take a look on the mock build.log file there -> > >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=86511&name=build.log > > > > You should try replacing this line: > > > > eclipse \ > > -nosplash \ > > > > with this line: > > > > java -cp $SDK/startup.jar \ > > -Dosgi.sharedConfiguration.area={_libdir}/eclipse/configuration \ > > org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main \ > > > > > Thanks Ben that work! :), there was just a little syntax error in the > above %_libdir macro (maybe that can be useful for others). > > - -Dosgi.sharedConfiguration.area={_libdir}/eclipse/configuration \ > + -Dosgi.sharedConfiguration.area=%{_libdir}/eclipse/configuration \ Sorry about that, I'm not sure how that happened. I'm glad hear things are now working for you. Cheers, Ben From overholt at redhat.com Tue Aug 7 16:19:23 2007 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 12:19:23 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] Jetty maintainer requested Message-ID: <1186503563.28711.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Hi, Jetty is now a requirement of the Eclipse SDK (for help) but I don't think I can do it justice as a maintainer. Is anyone able to be the Jetty maintainer? If so, see the review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202334 . Thanks, Andrew -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From overholt at redhat.com Tue Aug 14 17:32:50 2007 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:32:50 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] FeatureEclipse33 Status Message-ID: <1187112770.11441.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> Hi, Here's the status of the Fedora 8 feature of updating the Eclipse stack to the 3.3 (Europa) base [1]. I've CC'd all of the maintainers. Please reply with answers where you can. SDK (Ben Konrath) - largely done - working through a build-id issue - needs jetty5 review and inclusion (bug #202334) - need to investigate tweaking memory limits in eclipse.ini if IcedTea gets into F8 Mylyn (Andrew Overholt) - awaiting CVS rename - otherwise good to go EMF (Andrew Overholt) - would require a *tonne* of changes: probably multiple new SRPMs, lots of Provides and Obsoletes - since nothing depends upon it, I propose we drop it from Fedora 8 - anyone object? care to take it over? GEF (Andrew Overholt) - since nothing depends upon it, I propose we drop it from Fedora 8 - see last comment under EMF :) ChangeLog (Jeff Johnston) - mostly complete (I think) - Jeff? CDT & autotools (Jeff Johnston) - ready AFAIK - Jeff? Subclipse (Robert Marcano) - ready, right, Robert? PyDev (Igor Foox) - Igor: can you update to latest version that works with 3.3? If not, can you orphan it? Ben says he can take it over if you don't have time. - would be nice to get Mylyn integration in when we update sdl-nls, nlspackager (Andrew Overholt) - I'm going to remove these since there are no translations for 3.3 upstream checkstyle (Rob Myers) - things are good to go, right, Rob? quickrex (Alphonse Van Assche) - things work with 3.3, right, Alphonse? phpeclipse (Brandon Holbrook) - do things work with 3.3, Brandon? specfile editor (Alphonse Van Assche ... yes, I'm perhaps jumping the gun a bit here ;) - are we good to get this in by test2, Alphonse? Thanks, Andrew [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FeatureEclipse33 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From david at zarb.org Tue Aug 14 20:32:51 2007 From: david at zarb.org (David Walluck) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:32:51 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] FeatureEclipse33 Status In-Reply-To: <1187112770.11441.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1187112770.11441.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <46C21173.6030809@zarb.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Overholt wrote: > ChangeLog (Jeff Johnston) > - mostly complete (I think) > - Jeff? I couldn't build changelog. I get the following: BUILD FAILED /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build/scripts/build.xml:22: The following error occurred while executing this line: /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build/scripts/build.xml:37: The following error occurred while executing this line: /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build_3.3.0.v20070612/templates/headless-build/customTargets.xml:8: Cannot find /home/david/rpm/SPECS/eclipse-changelog/BUILD/eclipse-changelog-2.3.4/allElements.xml imported from /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build_3.3.0.v20070612/templates/headless-build/customTargets.xml I did not have time to investigate further. I can't build pydev either, but these seem to be some more serious issues with the code itself, particularly org/python/pydev/core/structure/FastStack.java. > checkstyle (Rob Myers) > - things are good to go, right, Rob? This isn't very recent. I did an updated spec for Mandriva. It is version 4.3.2 instead of 4.0.1. You can find it here: http://svn.mandriva.com/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/packages/cooker/eclipse-checkstyle/current/ It appears to work well. The only this is as far as the build, it doesn't use `buildscripts/copy-platform', but the original Fedora spec has this same problem. In general, that script is not consistently used across all plugin packages in Fedora. I have also packaged findbugs 1.2.1.20070531 if anyone at Fedora is interested. Good luck with FC8! - -- Sincerely, David Walluck -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mandriva - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGwhFzN5thZBYlTwkRAnR6AJ9T3/AUuabPklrCeDYmGuPSqkEk2wCcCGxQ rQXYp3xxac8mVAe+ETCOTUQ= =Kujz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From alcapcom at gmail.com Tue Aug 14 19:54:02 2007 From: alcapcom at gmail.com (Alphonse Van Assche) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:54:02 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] Re: check-buildroot script and unpacked eclipse bundles In-Reply-To: <46C206CC.2020603@gmail.com> References: <46C206CC.2020603@gmail.com> Message-ID: <46C2085A.9090003@gmail.com> eclipse-rse review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252223 From alcapcom at gmail.com Tue Aug 14 19:27:08 2007 From: alcapcom at gmail.com (Alphonse Van Assche) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:27:08 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] Re: FeatureEclipse33 Status In-Reply-To: <1187112770.11441.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1187112770.11441.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <46C2020C.4050304@gmail.com> Andrew Overholt a ?crit : > quickrex (Alphonse Van Assche) > - things work with 3.3, right, Alphonse? Yes, I have tested it with the eclipse version in rawhide and it work like expect. > specfile editor (Alphonse Van Assche ... yes, I'm perhaps jumping the > gun a bit here ;) > - are we good to get this in by test2, Alphonse? :) I think, I'm waiting the update of the changelog plugin (2.4.1 or so) because of namespaces incompatibility between the current version (2.3.4) and the specfile editor. Btw, I have just finished packaging Remote System Explorer (RSE) plugins, I think that there isn't many work to do on it to be able to get it right for test2. Cheers, Alphonse From alcapcom at gmail.com Tue Aug 14 19:47:24 2007 From: alcapcom at gmail.com (Alphonse Van Assche) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:47:24 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] check-buildroot script and unpacked eclipse bundles Message-ID: <46C206CC.2020603@gmail.com> Hi *, The build of eclipse packages that contain unpacked bundles seems to give problem when build with mock on rawhide. This error occur because check-buildroot script try to find the buildroot path in installed files. From what I understand of that script only *.jar.so.debug files are not checked in this case. The strange think is that the debuginfo package build with rpmbuild have the same .so.debug (unpacked eclipse bundles) that contain the buildroot too but the build finish with sucess. I have check if the check-buildroot script have been modified between F-7 and rawhide but the problem is not there. I would like to report that in bugzilla but I don't know witch package is incriminate. Any idea guys? Thanks Alphonse En of error.log file contain: + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot Binary file /var/tmp/eclipse-rse-2.0.0.1-1.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/gcj/eclipse-rse/org.eclipse.rse.services.dstore_2.0.0.200708141456.so.debug matches Binary file /var/tmp/eclipse-rse-2.0.0.1-1.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/gcj/eclipse-rse/org.eclipse.rse.services.telnet_1.0.0.200708141456.so.debug matches Binary file /var/tmp/eclipse-rse-2.0.0.1-1.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/gcj/eclipse-rse/org.eclipse.dstore.extra_2.0.0.200708141456.so.debug matches Binary file /var/tmp/eclipse-rse-2.0.0.1-1.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/gcj/eclipse-rse/org.eclipse.rse.services_2.0.0.200708141456.so.debug matches Binary file /var/tmp/eclipse-rse-2.0.0.1-1.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/gcj/eclipse-rse/org.eclipse.rse.services.files.ftp_2.0.0.200708141456.so.debug matches Found '/var/tmp/eclipse-rse-2.0.0.1-1.fc8-root-mockbuild' in installed files; aborting From david at zarb.org Wed Aug 15 08:01:46 2007 From: david at zarb.org (David Walluck) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 04:01:46 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] Re: check-buildroot script and unpacked eclipse bundles In-Reply-To: <46C2085A.9090003@gmail.com> References: <46C206CC.2020603@gmail.com> <46C2085A.9090003@gmail.com> Message-ID: <46C2B2EA.7010009@zarb.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Alphonse Van Assche wrote: > eclipse-rse review request: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252223 Why do you hard-code the oro and commons-net versions in the spec file instead of just using /usr/share/java/oro.jar and /usr/share/java/commons-net.jar, respectively? Even if they have to be versioned in the destination links, the source links should not be versioned since it would force an unnecessary change to the spec and a rebuild any time either oro or commons-net versions are updated. - -- Sincerely, David Walluck -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mandriva - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGwrLqN5thZBYlTwkRAvPEAJ9BhbbzO+HvOsY1M8f5i554s+mndwCbBLxg qbDPjN/QHrrUwuandWbzu6k= =n/cN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From alcapcom at gmail.com Wed Aug 15 10:49:21 2007 From: alcapcom at gmail.com (Alphonse Van Assche) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:49:21 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] Re: check-buildroot script and unpacked eclipse bundles In-Reply-To: <46C2B2EA.7010009@zarb.org> References: <46C206CC.2020603@gmail.com> <46C2085A.9090003@gmail.com> <46C2B2EA.7010009@zarb.org> Message-ID: <46C2DA31.5060706@gmail.com> David Walluck a ?crit : > Even if they have to be versioned in the destination links, the source > links should not be versioned since it would force an unnecessary change > to the spec and a rebuild any time either oro or commons-net versions > are updated. +1 The idea was that changes in both of these API can break some things without be warned but yes, these API should probably not change drastically in the future and there is many chance that new versions don't break anything. I modified the specfile according with that, thank you. Alphonse From fropeter at online.no Wed Aug 15 20:01:06 2007 From: fropeter at online.no (Frode Petersen) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 22:01:06 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] FeatureEclipse33 Status In-Reply-To: <1187112770.11441.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1187112770.11441.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <46C35B82.2010304@online.no> Andrew Overholt wrote: > Hi, > > Here's the status of the Fedora 8 feature of updating the Eclipse stack > to the 3.3 (Europa) base [1]. I've CC'd all of the maintainers. Please > reply with answers where you can. snip... > EMF (Andrew Overholt) > - would require a *tonne* of changes: probably multiple new SRPMs, lots > of Provides and Obsoletes > - since nothing depends upon it, I propose we drop it from Fedora 8 > - anyone object? care to take it over? > > GEF (Andrew Overholt) > - since nothing depends upon it, I propose we drop it from Fedora 8 > - see last comment under EMF :) Hi. I just want to notify you about one program that uses these: Omondo EclipseUML ( http://www.omondo.com ). There is a free 'community' release as well as a commercial one. You might want to look into if and how the changes will affect users of 3rd party software. I don't know whether these changes would create any problems at all, I just want to make sure that this is considered. Regards Frode Petersen From overholt at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 15:43:12 2007 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:43:12 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] FeatureEclipse33 Status In-Reply-To: <46C35B82.2010304@online.no> References: <1187112770.11441.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46C35B82.2010304@online.no> Message-ID: <1187278992.19623.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 22:01 +0200, Frode Petersen wrote: > Hi. I just want to notify you about one program that uses these: > Omondo EclipseUML ( http://www.omondo.com ). There is a free > 'community' release as well as a commercial one. > > You might want to look into if and how the changes will affect users > of 3rd party software. They won't AFAIK as people can still always use the update site for whatever to install into their home directory. > I don't know whether these changes would create any problems at all, I > just want to make sure that this is considered. Thanks for keeping us aware :) Andrew -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From overholt at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 15:43:49 2007 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:43:49 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] Re: FeatureEclipse33 Status In-Reply-To: <46C2020C.4050304@gmail.com> References: <1187112770.11441.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46C2020C.4050304@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1187279029.19623.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 21:27 +0200, Alphonse Van Assche wrote: > Andrew Overholt a ?crit : > > quickrex (Alphonse Van Assche) > > - things work with 3.3, right, Alphonse? > Yes, I have tested it with the eclipse version in rawhide and it work > like expect. Great, thanks. > > specfile editor (Alphonse Van Assche ... yes, I'm perhaps jumping the > > gun a bit here ;) > > - are we good to get this in by test2, Alphonse? > :) I think, I'm waiting the update of the changelog plugin (2.4.1 or so) > because of namespaces incompatibility between the current version > (2.3.4) and the specfile editor. Yeah, I'm trying to get that sorted out. You should see it hit rawhide in the next day or so. > Btw, I have just finished packaging Remote System Explorer (RSE) > plugins, I think that there isn't many work to do on it to be able to > get it right for test2. Sweet. Andrew -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From overholt at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 15:47:05 2007 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:47:05 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] FeatureEclipse33 Status In-Reply-To: <46C21173.6030809@zarb.org> References: <1187112770.11441.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46C21173.6030809@zarb.org> Message-ID: <1187279225.19623.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 16:32 -0400, David Walluck wrote: > I couldn't build changelog. I get the following: > > BUILD FAILED > /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build/scripts/build.xml:22: > The following error occurred while executing this line: > /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build/scripts/build.xml:37: > The following error occurred while executing this line: > /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build_3.3.0.v20070612/templates/headless-build/customTargets.xml:8: > Cannot find > /home/david/rpm/SPECS/eclipse-changelog/BUILD/eclipse-changelog-2.3.4/allElements.xml > imported from > /usr/share/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build_3.3.0.v20070612/templates/headless-build/customTargets.xml Hmm. I'm trying to update to 2.5.0 and I'm running into other problems. I'll hopefully not hit this particular issue but thanks for keeping me up to date anyway. > I can't build pydev either, but these seem to be some more serious > issues with the code itself, particularly > org/python/pydev/core/structure/FastStack.java. Ugh. I think Ben said he'd take a look at this when he gets back to work on Monday. Thanks. > > checkstyle (Rob Myers) > > - things are good to go, right, Rob? > > This isn't very recent. I did an updated spec for Mandriva. It is > version 4.3.2 instead of 4.0.1. You can find it here: > http://svn.mandriva.com/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/packages/cooker/eclipse-checkstyle/current/ > > It appears to work well. The only this is as far as the build, it > doesn't use `buildscripts/copy-platform', but the original Fedora spec > has this same problem. In general, that script is not consistently used > across all plugin packages in Fedora. Can you point to any specific examples? That script is a stupid hack anyway, but unless we get some time to fix things upstream, it's not going to go away :( See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EclipseHelpWanted > I have also packaged findbugs 1.2.1.20070531 if anyone at Fedora is > interested. Cool. Anyone? > Good luck with FC8! Thanks, David :) Andrew -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From alcapcom at gmail.com Thu Aug 16 15:56:20 2007 From: alcapcom at gmail.com (Alphonse Van Assche) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:56:20 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] FeatureEclipse33 Status In-Reply-To: <1187279225.19623.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1187112770.11441.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46C21173.6030809@zarb.org> <1187279225.19623.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <46C473A4.8050607@gmail.com> Andrew Overholt a ?crit : > On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 16:32 -0400, David Walluck wrote: >> I have also packaged findbugs 1.2.1.20070531 if anyone at Fedora is >> interested. > > Cool. Anyone? > I can take it. David can you say me where can I find these specfiles? From overholt at redhat.com Thu Aug 16 21:58:45 2007 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:58:45 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] Re: FeatureEclipse33 Status In-Reply-To: <46C2020C.4050304@gmail.com> References: <1187112770.11441.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46C2020C.4050304@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1187301525.29773.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 21:27 +0200, Alphonse Van Assche wrote: > :) I think, I'm waiting the update of the changelog plugin (2.4.1 or > so) because of namespaces incompatibility between the current version > (2.3.4) and the specfile editor. 2.5.1 should hit rawhide tomorrow. Andrew -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From overholt at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 19:08:28 2007 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:08:28 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] check-buildroot script and unpacked eclipse bundles In-Reply-To: <46C206CC.2020603@gmail.com> References: <46C206CC.2020603@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1187377708.4182.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> Hi, On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 21:47 +0200, Alphonse Van Assche wrote: > > The build of eclipse packages that contain unpacked bundles seems to > give problem when build with mock on rawhide. This error occur because > check-buildroot script try to find the buildroot path in installed > files. Ben was working through a similar issue with the SDK AFAIK. I don't know if he finished it before he went on vacation the other day but he'll be back on Monday so maybe he'll be able to help then. > From what I understand of that script only *.jar.so.debug files > are not checked in this case. > [...] > En of error.log file contain: > + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot > Binary file > /var/tmp/eclipse-rse-2.0.0.1-1.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/gcj/eclipse-rse/org.eclipse.rse.services.dstore_2.0.0.200708141456.so.debug You don't have BuildArch: noarch, do you? Andrew -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From jjohnstn at redhat.com Fri Aug 17 19:19:40 2007 From: jjohnstn at redhat.com (Jeff Johnston) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:19:40 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] Re: FeatureEclipse33 Status In-Reply-To: <1187112770.11441.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1187112770.11441.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <46C5F4CC.4040604@redhat.com> Andrew Overholt wrote: > Hi, > > Here's the status of the Fedora 8 feature of updating the Eclipse stack > to the 3.3 (Europa) base [1]. I've CC'd all of the maintainers. Please > reply with answers where you can. > > > ChangeLog (Jeff Johnston) > - mostly complete (I think) > - Jeff? Missing removed files support (major usability issue). The entry seems to stop when there are strange files (e.g. gifs or binary files it knows nothing about) (major bug). New files should just put: New file comment beside them (minor nit). If all of these are fixed, then I would say it is complete. > > CDT & autotools (Jeff Johnston) > - ready AFAIK > - Jeff? Ready enough. Would like to add template support for the autoconf editor. Would like to add sample wizards for new autotools executable project, new autotools library project, possibly a few more... From alcapcom at gmail.com Sat Aug 18 10:42:01 2007 From: alcapcom at gmail.com (Alphonse Van Assche) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 12:42:01 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] check-buildroot script and unpacked eclipse bundles In-Reply-To: <1187377708.4182.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <46C206CC.2020603@gmail.com> <1187377708.4182.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <46C6CCF9.9020707@gmail.com> Andrew Overholt a ?crit : > Hi, Hi, > Ben was working through a similar issue with the SDK AFAIK. I don't > know if he finished it before he went on vacation the other day but > he'll be back on Monday so maybe he'll be able to help then. Thanks, I should then wait that Ben is back from vacation to work on that. > You don't have BuildArch: noarch, do you? The package is noarch only when it's build without gcj support, if the package is build as noarch, normally mock build should not fails (I have not test that) Good week end guys, Alphonse From alcapcom at gmail.com Sun Aug 19 13:42:58 2007 From: alcapcom at gmail.com (Alphonse Van Assche) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 15:42:58 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] Re: FeatureEclipse33 Status In-Reply-To: <1187301525.29773.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1187112770.11441.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46C2020C.4050304@gmail.com> <1187301525.29773.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <46C848E2.6040400@gmail.com> Andrew Overholt a ?crit : > On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 21:27 +0200, Alphonse Van Assche wrote: >> :) I think, I'm waiting the update of the changelog plugin (2.4.1 or >> so) because of namespaces incompatibility between the current version >> (2.3.4) and the specfile editor. > > 2.5.1 should hit rawhide tomorrow. Nice, I have just put the specfile editor package for review[1], it only need some code of rpmlint 0.81, I will send a mail to Ville to ask him if he will include this part of code in the rpmlint rawhide package. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253434 Cheers, Alphonse From overholt at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 14:05:49 2007 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:05:49 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] Re: FeatureEclipse33 Status In-Reply-To: <46C848E2.6040400@gmail.com> References: <1187112770.11441.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46C2020C.4050304@gmail.com> <1187301525.29773.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46C848E2.6040400@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20070820140548.GF6249@redhat.com> * Alphonse Van Assche [2007-08-19 09:44]: > Andrew Overholt a ?crit : > >On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 21:27 +0200, Alphonse Van Assche wrote: > >>:) I think, I'm waiting the update of the changelog plugin (2.4.1 or > >>so) because of namespaces incompatibility between the current version > >>(2.3.4) and the specfile editor. > > > >2.5.1 should hit rawhide tomorrow. > > Nice, I have just put the specfile editor package for review[1], it only > need some code of rpmlint 0.81, I will send a mail to Ville to ask him > if he will include this part of code in the rpmlint rawhide package. > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253434 I'll try to get to this ASAP. Andrew -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bkonrath at redhat.com Mon Aug 20 19:43:26 2007 From: bkonrath at redhat.com (Ben Konrath) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:43:26 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] check-buildroot script and unpacked eclipse bundles In-Reply-To: <1187377708.4182.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <46C206CC.2020603@gmail.com> <1187377708.4182.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1187639006.3010.3.camel@plug> On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 15:08 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 21:47 +0200, Alphonse Van Assche wrote: > > > > The build of eclipse packages that contain unpacked bundles seems to > > give problem when build with mock on rawhide. This error occur because > > check-buildroot script try to find the buildroot path in installed > > files. > > Ben was working through a similar issue with the SDK AFAIK. I don't > know if he finished it before he went on vacation the other day but > he'll be back on Monday so maybe he'll be able to help then. The problem I had with the SDK package was that the build-id was not set in the eclipse binary launcher so this is not the same problem. I briefly looked into this but didn't find the problem. Sorry. Ben > > From what I understand of that script only *.jar.so.debug files > > are not checked in this case. > > [...] > > En of error.log file contain: > > + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot > > Binary file > > /var/tmp/eclipse-rse-2.0.0.1-1.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/gcj/eclipse-rse/org.eclipse.rse.services.dstore_2.0.0.200708141456.so.debug > > You don't have BuildArch: noarch, do you? > > Andrew > -- > fedora-devel-java-list mailing list > fedora-devel-java-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list From deeptika at adobe.com Tue Aug 21 10:58:51 2007 From: deeptika at adobe.com (Deeptika Gottipati) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:28:51 +0530 Subject: [fedora-java] Fedora 7 and Eclipse 3.3 Message-ID: <6EDF3FB32D141949A80915FB09CD7FA703486C66@INDIAMAIL.corp.adobe.com> Hi, When I try to run eclipse 3.3 on fedora 7, it gives some memory leak warnings as following GC Warning: Repeated allocation of very large block (appr. Size 651264) May lead to memory leak and poor performance I get this warning even after changing memory size to max (512) in eclipse.ini And later, when I add more plug-ins to eclipse and try running that, it gives segmentation fault. Please let me know if there is any workaround. Thanks, Deeptika -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From deeptika at adobe.com Tue Aug 21 10:51:43 2007 From: deeptika at adobe.com (root) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:21:43 +0530 Subject: [fedora-java] Fedora 7 and Eclipse 3.3 Message-ID: <1187693503.6655.4.camel@deeptika01.macromedia.com> I get the following warning when I try to run Eclipse 3.3 on Fedora 7. GC Warning: Repeated allocation of very large block (appr. size 651264): May lead to memory leak and poor performance. I get this even after setting mem size to max(512) in eclipse.ini And later, when I try to add more plugins, eclipse terminates itself showing segmentation fault. Please let me know if there is any workaround? Thanks, Deeptika From overholt at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 12:39:27 2007 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:39:27 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] Fedora 7 and Eclipse 3.3 In-Reply-To: <6EDF3FB32D141949A80915FB09CD7FA703486C66@INDIAMAIL.corp.adobe.com> References: <6EDF3FB32D141949A80915FB09CD7FA703486C66@INDIAMAIL.corp.adobe.com> Message-ID: <20070821123926.GA13263@redhat.com> Hi, * Deeptika Gottipati [2007-08-21 06:59]: > > When I try to run eclipse 3.3 on fedora 7, it gives some memory leak > warnings as following You're trying to use an upstream 3.3 download with gij, the GNU interpreter for java bytecode. Upstream downloads don't have gcj pre-compiled bits and thus run very poorly with just gij. If you want to run an upstream download, you're best to use a proprietary JVM like Sun's or IBM's. If you want, you could try out IcedTea which is OpenJDK built with completely free stuff. See: http://iced-tea.org/wiki/Main_Page HTH, Andrew -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bkonrath at redhat.com Tue Aug 21 18:38:50 2007 From: bkonrath at redhat.com (Ben Konrath) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:38:50 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] Re: FeatureEclipse33 Status In-Reply-To: <29c1e9a40708170613v3caa3d9bs88c72ce71ed8758d@mail.gmail.com> References: <1187112770.11441.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <29c1e9a40708170613v3caa3d9bs88c72ce71ed8758d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1187721530.4264.11.camel@toast.toronto.redhat.com> On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 09:13 -0400, Igor Foox wrote: > Hi all, > > On 8/14/07, Andrew Overholt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Here's the status of the Fedora 8 feature of updating the Eclipse stack > > to the 3.3 (Europa) base [1]. I've CC'd all of the maintainers. Please > > reply with answers where you can. > > > > PyDev (Igor Foox) > > - Igor: can you update to latest version that works with 3.3? If not, > > can you orphan it? Ben says he can take it over if you don't have time. > > - would be nice to get Mylyn integration in when we update > > I won't have the time to update PyDev for this release unfortunately. > I would appreciate it if Ben could take over for now. I will probably > be able to take it back in a month or two. Ok, can you add me to the ACL and I'll update it for this release? Why don't we say that we're co-maintaining pydev so that you can still help out when you have time. Thanks, Ben From kwade at redhat.com Wed Aug 22 16:30:52 2007 From: kwade at redhat.com (Karsten Wade) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:30:52 -0700 Subject: [fedora-java] FOP for F8? Message-ID: <1187800252.14030.193.camel@erato.phig.org> I've been watching the progress with IcedTea, and am wondering if anyone has plans to package FOP for Fedora 8? I guess I should ask the same thing about Saxon. :) We have a patch for xmlto in bugzilla waiting for FOP to be in the distro so we can set it as a target. I wanted to get a status to find out if we should/could be pushing people to get all the pieces we need for a FOP toolchain to produce PDFs from DocBook XML. cheers - Karsten -- Karsten Wade ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.fedorapeople.org | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From fitzsim at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 00:34:56 2007 From: fitzsim at redhat.com (Thomas Fitzsimmons) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 20:34:56 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] FOP for F8? In-Reply-To: <1187800252.14030.193.camel@erato.phig.org> References: <1187800252.14030.193.camel@erato.phig.org> Message-ID: <46CCD630.60105@redhat.com> Karsten Wade wrote: > I've been watching the progress with IcedTea, and am wondering if anyone > has plans to package FOP for Fedora 8? > > I guess I should ask the same thing about Saxon. :) > > We have a patch for xmlto in bugzilla waiting for FOP to be in the > distro so we can set it as a target. I wanted to get a status to find > out if we should/could be pushing people to get all the pieces we need > for a FOP toolchain to produce PDFs from DocBook XML. Tania Bento is looking into it. She's already got the latest Batik Beta building on IcedTea. Francis is fixing some IcedTea bugs exposed by the Batik testsuite. I think Tania has now moved on to trying to build FOP on IcedTea. Tania, can you explain your status to Karsten? Thanks, Tom From mefoster at gmail.com Thu Aug 23 07:19:22 2007 From: mefoster at gmail.com (Mary Ellen Foster) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:19:22 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] Packaging jgoodies-looks and jgoodies-forms Message-ID: I'm thinking of packaging jgoodies-looks and jgoodies-forms for Fedora -- they're required for the GUI admin tool for the Ice distributed object middleware that I'm also wanting to package: it's a big package that's currently under review (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234612). I already have local packages of jgoodies that I use for building my own version of Ice, but it's not in Fedora yet so I've disable that part of the build for now in the package under review. Is there anything I should be aware of when packaging jgoodies, or should I just go for it. :) Thanks, MEF -- Mary Ellen Foster http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/mef/ From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Thu Aug 23 13:06:40 2007 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:06:40 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [fedora-java] FeatureEclipse33 Status In-Reply-To: <46C35B82.2010304@online.no> References: <1187112770.11441.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46C35B82.2010304@online.no> Message-ID: <13256.192.54.193.51.1187874400.squirrel@rousalka.dyndns.org> Le Mer 15 ao?t 2007 22:01, Frode Petersen a ?crit : > Andrew Overholt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Here's the status of the Fedora 8 feature of updating the Eclipse >> stack >> to the 3.3 (Europa) base [1]. I've CC'd all of the maintainers. >> Please >> reply with answers where you can. > > snip... >> EMF (Andrew Overholt) >> - would require a *tonne* of changes: probably multiple new SRPMs, >> lots >> of Provides and Obsoletes >> - since nothing depends upon it, I propose we drop it from Fedora 8 >> - anyone object? care to take it over? >> >> GEF (Andrew Overholt) >> - since nothing depends upon it, I propose we drop it from Fedora 8 >> - see last comment under EMF :) > > Hi. I just want to notify you about one program that uses these: > Omondo > EclipseUML ( http://www.omondo.com ). There is a free 'community' > release as well as a commercial one. A lot of people are likely to use eclipse for XML/WSDL editing, and IIRC the WTP requires GEF & EMF -- Nicolas Mailhot From neugens at limasoftware.net Thu Aug 23 13:47:09 2007 From: neugens at limasoftware.net (Mario Torre) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:47:09 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] Packaging jgoodies-looks and jgoodies-forms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1187876829.3399.7.camel@nirvana.limasoftware.net> Il giorno gio, 23/08/2007 alle 09.19 +0200, Mary Ellen Foster ha scritto: > Is there anything I should be aware of when packaging jgoodies, or > should I just go for it. :) > > Thanks, > > MEF Last time I've tried looks with classpath it had a crash with JTabbedPane (if I'm not wrong when setTabLayoutPolicy(JTabbedPane.SCROLL_TAB_LAYOUT), but I'm not sure about that). It may have been fixed since then, so you may want to check that, other than that, I remember it was working well, it would be a nice addition to the java stack. Mario -- Lima Software - http://www.limasoftware.net/ GNU Classpath Developer - http://www.classpath.org/ Fedora Ambassador - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MarioTorre Jabber: neugens at jabber.org pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF Please, support open standards: http://opendocumentfellowship.org/petition/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Questa ? una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente URL: From overholt at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 14:27:49 2007 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:27:49 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] FeatureEclipse33 Status In-Reply-To: <13256.192.54.193.51.1187874400.squirrel@rousalka.dyndns.org> References: <1187112770.11441.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46C35B82.2010304@online.no> <13256.192.54.193.51.1187874400.squirrel@rousalka.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <1187879269.11105.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 15:06 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > A lot of people are likely to use eclipse for XML/WSDL editing, and > IIRC the WTP requires GEF & EMF Yep, and they can just install them from the update site if we don't have packages of them. Andrew -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From caolanm at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 17:25:44 2007 From: caolanm at redhat.com (Caolan McNamara) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:25:44 +0100 Subject: [fedora-java] java.home/java.library.path etc, what can I rely on ? Message-ID: <1187889944.2487.9.camel@Nom> So, for.. class findhome { public static void main(String args[]) { System.out.println(System.getProperty("java.home")); System.out.println(System.getProperty("gnu.classpath.home.url")); System.out.println(System.getProperty("java.library.path")); } } javac findhome.java java findhome I have (on x86_64) ... /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-1.5.0.0/jre file:///usr/lib64 /usr/lib64/gcj-4.1.2 For something like OOo we have two sort of requirements, at run time we'd like to dlopen libjvm.so, currently the approach I took for gcj was to stick lib/ARCH/client/libjvm.so onto the value of java.home. I guess from the output here searching through java.library.path is also plausible ? The other requirement is at buildtime to link against libjawt.so and to find the java headers. but for e.g. suse right now apparently the output of the above (for i386) is.. /usr file:///usr/lib/gcc/i586-suse-linux/4.2.1 /usr/lib/gcj-4.2.1 So what I'm wondering is if there is a canonical reference to what the various properties should refer to. i.e. are my assumptions just busted, or is e.g. the suse gcj misconfigured and if there is more correct way to find libjvm.so. And while I'm at it is there a good solid cross platform and cross java-impl test to find the correct include and link path to build against the java headers and link to libjawt and friends. C. From bkonrath at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 16:46:27 2007 From: bkonrath at redhat.com (Ben Konrath) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:46:27 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] Re: FeatureEclipse33 Status In-Reply-To: <29c1e9a40708211150p36e21566h2b4ed9974e99f430@mail.gmail.com> References: <1187112770.11441.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <29c1e9a40708170613v3caa3d9bs88c72ce71ed8758d@mail.gmail.com> <1187721530.4264.11.camel@toast.toronto.redhat.com> <29c1e9a40708211150p36e21566h2b4ed9974e99f430@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1187887587.25375.1.camel@plug> On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 14:50 -0400, Igor Foox wrote: > Hey Ben, > > That sounds great, but I don't have access to fedora stuff atm, > because I don't have all the certs set up. I don't think you need me > to add you to the ACL, I believe you should be able to ask to be > added. Of course I could be wrong. :) Yep, you're wrong :) You have to to approve my requests for commit access here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/ If you can't do this, let me know and I'll request to have the ownership of eclipse-pydev moved to me. Thanks, Ben > Igor > > On 8/21/07, Ben Konrath wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 09:13 -0400, Igor Foox wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > On 8/14/07, Andrew Overholt wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Here's the status of the Fedora 8 feature of updating the Eclipse stack > > > > to the 3.3 (Europa) base [1]. I've CC'd all of the maintainers. Please > > > > reply with answers where you can. > > > > > > > > PyDev (Igor Foox) > > > > - Igor: can you update to latest version that works with 3.3? If not, > > > > can you orphan it? Ben says he can take it over if you don't have time. > > > > - would be nice to get Mylyn integration in when we update > > > > > > I won't have the time to update PyDev for this release unfortunately. > > > I would appreciate it if Ben could take over for now. I will probably > > > be able to take it back in a month or two. > > > > Ok, can you add me to the ACL and I'll update it for this release? Why > > don't we say that we're co-maintaining pydev so that you can still help > > out when you have time. > > > > Thanks, Ben > > > > From fkung at redhat.com Thu Aug 23 21:13:54 2007 From: fkung at redhat.com (Francis Kung) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:13:54 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] FOP for F8? In-Reply-To: <1187873652.2968.8.camel@toothpaste.toronto.redhat.com> References: <1187800252.14030.193.camel@erato.phig.org> <46CCD630.60105@redhat.com> <1187873652.2968.8.camel@toothpaste.toronto.redhat.com> Message-ID: <46CDF892.30206@redhat.com> Hi, > As Tom mentioned, I have successfully built the latest Batik Beta on > IcedTea. I am currently updating the Batik srpm to that version. There's a bug or two in IcedTea that causes a number of the Batik tests to crash, which I'm currently tracking down. > As for FOP, I haven't tried building that on IcedTea yet, as I am trying > to resolve a bunch of dependencies issues - I need to install many > packages first. I just did a build of FOP 0.92 (I had the sources lying around from many months ago when this last came up); it builds with IcedTea and all the bundled examples are generated properly. I haven't tried anything more complicated, ie combining FOP and Batik to run the entire toolchain, though. I also haven't tried using the srpm, so I don't know what packaging-related tasks are outstanding, and haven't tried building the newer 0.93 or 0.94. Cheers, Francis From fkung at redhat.com Tue Aug 28 21:13:35 2007 From: fkung at redhat.com (Francis Kung) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:13:35 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] FOP for F8? In-Reply-To: <46CCD630.60105@redhat.com> References: <1187800252.14030.193.camel@erato.phig.org> <46CCD630.60105@redhat.com> Message-ID: <46D48FFF.1050304@redhat.com> > Francis is fixing some IcedTea bugs exposed by the > Batik testsuite. I've just committed a patch into IcedTea that significantly improves our performance against the Batik testsuite. A few small rendering problems remain (see http://iced-tea.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64), but by and large it should all work now. I missed the IcedTea 1.3 release by a day, but it's in the mercurial repository and should be included in the next release. Cheers, Francis From alcapcom at gmail.com Fri Aug 31 10:08:38 2007 From: alcapcom at gmail.com (Alphonse Van Assche) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:08:38 +0200 Subject: [fedora-java] don't build debuginfo package Message-ID: <46D7E8A6.8020002@gmail.com> Hi list, I have a problem to build a Eclipse plugin package[1] in rawhide, that seems to be a bug in the last RPM package, I will fill a bug about this today. At first view, all Java package that include classes outside a jar file can have the same troubles (I should test this today too). With the coming of AcedTea as default JRE for F8 the debuginfo package can be useful only for 0,1% of our users base, that amount of people is probably less than that because the user must work on a ppc arch using eclipse-rse (the package that give problem) and must will to debug it. So, what do you think about adding %define debug_package %{nil} on the top of the specfile while this bug is not solved in the RPM package. [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2007-August/msg00009.html Thanks, Alphonse From bkonrath at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 19:34:39 2007 From: bkonrath at redhat.com (Ben Konrath) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:34:39 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] default vm memory settings for fedora eclipse Message-ID: <1188588879.14892.11.camel@plug> Hi, Now that Eclipse requires IcedTea by deault on x86 and x86_64 I'd like to change the default vm memory settings to be something a little more sane. Right now the -vmargs option is set to "-Xms40m -Xmx256m". What should I change it to? Thanks, Ben From bkonrath at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 20:03:40 2007 From: bkonrath at redhat.com (Ben Konrath) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:03:40 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] don't build debuginfo package In-Reply-To: <46D7E8A6.8020002@gmail.com> References: <46D7E8A6.8020002@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1188590620.14892.13.camel@plug> On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 12:08 +0200, Alphonse Van Assche wrote: > Hi list, > > I have a problem to build a Eclipse plugin package[1] in rawhide, that > seems to be a bug in the last RPM package, I will fill a bug about this > today. At first view, all Java package that include classes outside a > jar file can have the same troubles (I should test this today too). > > With the coming of AcedTea as default JRE for F8 the debuginfo package > can be useful only for 0,1% of our users base, that amount of people is > probably less than that because the user must work on a ppc arch using > eclipse-rse (the package that give problem) and must will to debug it. > > So, what do you think about adding %define debug_package %{nil} on the > top of the specfile while this bug is not solved in the RPM package. Seem reasonable to me. Anybody else? Ben > > [1] > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2007-August/msg00009.html > > Thanks, > Alphonse > > -- > fedora-devel-java-list mailing list > fedora-devel-java-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list From overholt at redhat.com Fri Aug 31 21:04:46 2007 From: overholt at redhat.com (Andrew Overholt) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:04:46 -0400 Subject: [fedora-java] default vm memory settings for fedora eclipse In-Reply-To: <1188588879.14892.11.camel@plug> References: <1188588879.14892.11.camel@plug> Message-ID: <20070831210446.GA3447@redhat.com> * Ben Konrath [2007-08-31 15:49]: > > Now that Eclipse requires IcedTea by deault on x86 and x86_64 I'd like > to change the default vm memory settings to be something a little more > sane. Right now the -vmargs option is set to "-Xms40m -Xmx256m". What > should I change it to? I think a higher minimum is in order. There's actually a bug open at eclipse.org (I don't have the number handy) about this. IIRC, the platform team didn't want to change the default since they're not shipping an IDE :) There were sensible values in the bug, though. FWIW, when I use IcedTea I use: -Xms512m -Xmx512m -XX:PermSize=128m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m But I have 2 GB of memory. Andrew -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mlists at juma.me.uk Fri Aug 31 21:37:32 2007 From: mlists at juma.me.uk (Ismael Juma) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:37:32 +0100 Subject: [fedora-java] default vm memory settings for fedora eclipse In-Reply-To: <20070831210446.GA3447@redhat.com> References: <1188588879.14892.11.camel@plug> <20070831210446.GA3447@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1188596252.30138.50.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 17:04 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote: > FWIW, when I use IcedTea I use: > > -Xms512m > -Xmx512m > -XX:PermSize=128m > -XX:MaxPermSize=128m I would suggest a lower -Xms and no -XX:PermSize (causing the starting size to be the default, 64MB for the 32-bit VM). The initial sizes don't need to be too large since some people may have less memory and/or small workspaces. It's just important to set a reasonable maximum to avoid OOMs (of the heap or permanent generation). Also, it's worth considering that the 64-bit version needs more memory. Regards, Ismael