[fedora-java] Why does eclipse now require lucene-devel?

[Andrew Overholt]

* Mary Ellen Foster <mefoster at gmail.com> [2007-02-10 08:28]:
> On 10/02/07, Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com> wrote:
> >So you've been using the JPackage lucene with Fedora Eclipse?
> >Interesting.  We don't usually recommend mixing repos like that due to
> >possible API differences between versions of things like lucene.  Did
> >the Eclipse help system indexing work for you?  That's where it uses
> >lucene.
> 
> Hee ... I have to say I haven't actually used the Eclipse help for
> probably several years now. (Typical programmer, never actually reads
> the documentation ... :) ) I remember it used to pop up a Mozilla
> window that I disliked.

It'll still do that :)  If you do end up trying it with lucene 1.9, try
searching for something.  If you haven't done this before, it'll
probably build an index.  If that works, we're a large percentage of the
way towards using 1.9 instead of 1.4.3.

Thanks,

Andrew
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/attachments/20070210/87cd4970/attachment.sig>