[fedora-java] Why does eclipse now require lucene-devel?

[Andrew Overholt]

* Ismael Juma <ismael at juma.me.uk> [2007-02-10 08:22]:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 08:07 -0500, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> [...]
> > We'll have to make sure the new version works with Eclipse.  ISTR it not
> > compiling against it but I guess we should investigate.  Upstream is
> > reluctant to move their dependencies forward like this.
> 
> According to this bug[1], eclipse 3.3 will depend on lucene 1.9.1. They
> can't use lucene 2.0 (or the soon to be released 2.1) because they rely
> on deprecated APIs that were removed from 2.x.

Cool, thanks for letting us know.  Perhaps we should look at helping
them move forward.  Otherwise, we'll have to have 1.9.1 in F8.

Andrew
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/attachments/20070210/8a7a270b/attachment.sig>