[fedora-java] java specfile reviewfest

[Andrew Overholt]

Hi,

* Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com> [2007-02-09 17:35]:
> 
> Some of us have decided to get together on Monday 12 February to grind
> through reviews for both the new packages required for maven2 and those
> for the existing core packages.

The maven2 review requests are here:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=Review+Request&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&emailreporter1=1&emailtype1=substring&email1=rafaels%40redhat.com&order=Importance

Deepak made a graph of build dependencies and we think these ones can be
done without depending on something that isn't currently in core:

jtidy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227075

gnu-regexp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227057

bea-stax
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227041

xmldb-api
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227123

ant-contrib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227027

dom2-core-tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227048

isorelax
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227061

relagxngDatatype
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227112

objectweb-anttask
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227091

tagsoup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227117

classpathx-jaxp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227046

icu4j
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592

xpp2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227126

xpp3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227127

junitperf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227077

piccolo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227092

javassist
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227067

gnu-trove
(I can't find the review request for this one ... Rafael?  Deepak?)

jrexx
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227074

jflex
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227070

servletapi4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227116

jython
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
This has already been approved but we need to investigate the inclusion
of python 2.2.  Is it just a BR?  If not, I'm concerned about shipping
another python version in the distro.  We're also not sure if it's
completely necessary ... supposedly batik needs it but we're hoping we
can avoid that dependency.

plexus-utils
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227106

dtdparser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227050

emma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227052

jakarta-commons-cli
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227063

nekohtml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227090

jakarta-commons-io
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227064

maven2-common-poms (need to remove erroneous saxon BR)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227079

Andrew
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/attachments/20070210/842990c5/attachment.sig>